lO 



/. Roylei. Below Moorswater, v.c. 2, E. Cornwall, Sept. 

 6, 1901.— See note by A. O. Hume, C.B. in Journ. Hot., May, 

 1901. Thoroughly naturalized. — H. S. Thompson. 



Trifolium hyhridum, Linn. Coldharbour, v.c. 20, Herts. 

 Coll. D. M. Higgins. August, 1899.— A. Smith. This 

 material is insufficient to name. — A. Bennett. Only two very 

 small specimens supplied. — A.H. W.-D. 



T. hybridufir, b. elegans (Savi). Cultivated land, Ditchling, 

 v.c. 14, E. Sussex. August, 1901.— T. Hilton. I think 

 correct. — A. Bennett. A single specimen. — A.H. W.-D. 



Anthyllis vulneraria, Linn. b. coccinea, Linn. Newmarket 

 Hill, v.c. 14, E. Sussex. May, 1901.— T. Hilton. 



Lotus covniculatus, Linn. var. crasstfolius, Pers. Walls 

 of Scarborough Castle, v.c. 62, N.E. Yorks. August 12, 1901. 

 — C. Waterfall. It may be so, but I doubt it. It is easy to 

 tell when living, but difficult when dried. — A. Bennett. 



Coronilla scorpioides, Koch. Waste ground by rails, West 

 Dock Reservation, Hull, v.c. 61, E. Yorks. Coll. S. Mason. 

 October, 1901. — C. Waterfall. Named by Rev. W. R. 

 Linton.— C.W. 



Vicia temiifolia^ Roth. In an old gravel pit, Wheat- 

 hampstead, v.c. 20, Herts. June 15, 1901.-^D. M. Higgins. 

 Yes, var. stenophylla ; a native of woods and bushy places 

 in S. Europe and the East, which becomes a very common 

 weed along field borders in some parts of its range. Doubtless 

 in this case, as at Wandsworth (the only previous record 

 known to me), a grain introduction. — S. T. Dunn. 



Lathyms montamis, var. temiifolius, Reich, fil. Wyre Eorest, 

 v.c. 37, Worcester, June, 1901. — H. S. Thompson. Also 

 sent by E. Cleminshaw and J. B. Duncan. All correct, 

 I think, but I have seen it in W. Kent more extreme than the 

 extremest of these specimens. — A.H. W.-D. 



L. montamis, var. latifoUiis. Wyre Forest, v.c. 37, 

 Worcester, June 2, 1901. — H. S. Thompson. I consider this 

 form as worthy of a name as the narrow-leaved var. tenuifolius, 

 and propose var. latifolius. — H.S.T. That may be, but if all 

 extremes of breadth or length of leaf, as well as of multitudes 

 of other characters, were to receive varietal names, our 

 catalogues would be considerably increased in length. These 

 specimens are certainly very broad-leaved. — A.H. W.-D. 



