7 



R. acris, L. var. Hickling Marshes, Norfolk, v.c. 27, 

 June, 1902. — Mrs. Cotton. Is R. BorceanuSf Jord. — F. 

 Townsend. 



Fumaria muralisy Sond. ? Weed in garden. Saint- 

 field, CO. Down, October, 1895, and August, 1896. For 

 naming only.— C. H. Waddell. One of these is F. 

 confusa, Jord ; the other, with darker flowers, a form 

 which I have seen from various Irish localities, but not 

 from Great Britain. It is very near to F. confusa, and 

 perhaps only a form or variety of it. I hope to report 

 further on this plant on a future occasion.— H.W. P. 



F. confusa, Jord. Llanfairfechan, Carnarvon, i6th 

 September, 1902. A small flowered autumnal form. — • 

 H. W. Pugsley. 



F. officinalis, L. (i) Magheralin, co. Down, 

 August, 1898. (2) Castor's Bay, co. Armagh, July, 1896. 

 For naming only. — C. H. Waddell. Yes. both F. 

 officinalis, L. — H.W. P. 



F. Vaillantii, Loisel. ? Waste land, Harborne, 

 Warwickshire, August, 1892. For naming only. — H. S. 

 Thompson. No, F. officinalis, L. only ; one specimen 

 approaching F. Wirtgeni, Koch. — H.W. P. 



Arabis ciliata, R.Br. Castlegregory, S. Kerry, 24th 

 June, 1902. — E. S. Marshall. A few of the specimens 

 sent have the leaves and stem more or less hairy, and 

 would therefore appear referable to the var. hispida, 

 which Syme distinguished from the type by its leaves 

 being clothed with forked and trifurcate hairs, instead of 

 glabrous, except for the ciliate margins. An interesting 

 note on this plant appears in ''J. of B." for August, 

 1903.— H.W.P. 



A. ciliata, R.Br., var. hispida, Syme. Sandhills, N. 

 of Castlegregory, S. Kerry. With the type, but more 

 plentiful. 24th June, 1902.— E. S. Marshall. 



Draha rupestris, R. Br. On rocks near the summit 

 of Ben Lawers, Mid Perth, Aug, 1902. — E. Cleminshaw. 



Erophila prcecox, D.C. {=E. brachycarpa, Jord.) 

 Downs, Houghton, v.c. 13, West Sussex, 3rd May, 1902. 

 — E. S. Marshall. 



