12 



R. hibernicus, Rogers. Roadside hedge, Doran's 

 Rock, Saintfield, Co. Down, 29th July, 1902. — C. H. 

 Waddell. 



R. dunensisy Rogers. Roadside, Saintfield, Co. Down, 

 29th July, 1902. — C. H. Waddell. 



R, dunensis, Rogers. Cascum, P. of Aghaderg, Co. 

 Down, 15th August, 1902. — H. W. Lett. 



R. oigoclados, Muell. and Lefv. Maxstoke, Warwick- 

 shire, v.c. 38, July, 1886. — J. E. Bagnall. 



R. Bloxamianus, Coleman. Hartshill, Warwickshire^ 

 v.c. 38, August, 1885.— J. E. Bagnall. 



A. scaber, W. and N. Hartshill, Warwickshire, 

 v.c. 38, August, 1887, and September, 1889. — J. E. 

 Bagnall. 



R. ftiscus, W. and N. (form). Blackslough, Somerset, 

 9th August, 1892. — E.F.Linton. Best under R . fuscus . 

 W. and N., I suspect, though further from the type than 

 the Convent " plant.— W.M.R. 



R. ''A." Pitt's Wood, Hafborne, 



Worcestershire, 25th June, 1901. — H. -S. Thompson. 

 This strongly recalls other British specimens named 

 R. hostilis, Muell. and Wirtg. by Dr. Focke ; but we can 

 hardly assign that name to it with any confidence, 

 without seeing maturer pieces of both stem and panicle. 

 Fully developed leaves especially are desirable (with note 

 as to whether they are dark green and shining above 

 when fresh) and panicle showing direction of fruiting 

 sepals. R, hostilis would be a new record for Worcester- 

 shire.— W. M. R. 



R. saxicohis, P. J. Muell. Open place, Saintfield, 

 Co. Down, 15th August, 1902. — C. H. Waddell. It 

 would be misleading, I fear, to let this be distributed thus 

 labelled without comment It is no doubt the same form 

 which was sent unnamed to the Club by Mr. Waddell in 

 1895, and is referred to by me in the Report for that year 

 as ''Allied, I think, to R. saxicolus, P. J. Muell, though 

 more strongly armed and thus diverging from it in the 

 direction of R. Marshalii.'" It must, moreover, be 

 remembered that Mueller's saxicolus is one of our least 



