7 
no  fruit,  appears  to  be  a  form  of  F.  capreolata ,  L.,  with  the 
sepals  shorter  than  usual,  and  thus  simulating  F.  speciosa , 
Jord.— H.W.P. 
F.  Bored ,  Jord.,  var.  serotina ,  Clavaud.  Saintfield,  co. 
Down,  Sept.,  1903. — C.  H.  Waddell.  Comm.,  H.  W. 
Pugsley. 
F.  confusa,  Jord.  Cultivated  fields  near  Morthoe  Railway 
Station,  N.  Devon,  v.c.  4,  7  Sept.,  1903. — H.  W.  Pugsley. 
F.  confusa ,  Jord.?  Weed  in  garden,  Saintfield,  co.  Down, 
Sept.,  1904. — C.  H.  Waddell.  These  specimens  belong  to  a 
variety  or  ally  of  F.  confusa ,  and  are  identical  with  those 
from  the  same  locality  referred  to  on  page  7  of  the  Club’s 
Report  for  1902-3. — H.W.P. 
F.  - .  Gilly  Tresamble,  Perran-ar-worthal,  W. 
Cornwall,  v.c.  1,  8  Oct.,  1904.  The  plant  occurs  in  plenty  in 
several  potato,  turnip,  and  cabbage  fields,  over  an  area  of 
two  miles  in  the  parish  of  Perran-ar-worthal,  and  was  found 
later  twelve  or  fourteen  miles  distant,  near  the  North  coast. 
The  wonder  is  that  so  striking  a  plant  should  have  escaped 
our  notice  until  now. — F.  H.  Davey.  Your  plant  is 
undoubtedly  allied  to  F.  Bored  and  F.  confusa ,  and  is  probably 
nearer  the  latter,  from  which  it  differs  in  the  dark-tipped 
corolla,  slightly  larger  and  broader  sepals,  still  shorter  bracts, 
and  rugulose  acute  instead  of  rugose,  more  obtuse  fruits.  It 
may,  in  fact,  be  regarded  as  a  confusa ,  with  the  colour  of 
Bored  and  muralis,  and  the  fruits  of  muralis  somewhat  enlarged. 
It  is  almost  identical,  according  to  Jordan’s  description,  with 
his  F.  vagans,  a  French  species  which,  with  F.  confusa ,  was 
united  by  Haussknecht  with  F.  Gussonii ,  Boiss,  under  the 
latter  name.  There  is  no  doubt  in  my  mind,  though,  that  it 
is  as  different  from  F.  confusa  as  F.  muralis  is  from  F.  Bored , 
perhaps  more  so.  I  shall  hope  to  compare  it  with  specimens 
at  the  British  Museum  during  the  winter  and  will  write 
further.— H.W.P. 
(Later).  This  plant,  which  was  found  in  more  than  one 
locality  last  Autumn  by  Mr.  Davey,  cannot  be  referred  to 
any  of  the  British  species  and  I  am  unable,  at  present,  to 
name  it.  The  fruits  on  the  specimen  sent  have  all  been 
crushed  in  the  press  and  are  thus  worthless.— H.W.P. 
F.  Vaillantii ,  Loisel.  (1)  Chalk  pits  and  cultivated 
ground,  Gogmagog  Hills,  Cambs.,  v.c.  29,  12  July,  1904.— 
A.  Hosking.  (2)  Cornfields  on  Beacon  Hill,  near  Devizes, 
N.  Wilts.,  v.c.  7,  15  May,  1904. — E.  S.  Marshall.  Both 
gatherings  correct. — H.W.P, 
