62 
Calamintha  parviflora,  Lam.  Roadside  between 
Babraham  and  Little  Abington,  Cambs.,  v.c.  29,  Aug.  12, 
1905. — Coll.  R.  H.  Goode.  Comm.  G.  Goode. 
Nepeta  Glechoma,  Benth.,  var.  parviflora,  Bentb. 
(1)  Lowesby,  Leics.,  v.c.  55,  May  21,  1905. — A.  R.  Horwood. 
(2)  Scraptoft,  Leics.,  May  18,  1905. — A.  R.  Horwood.  (3) 
Sheet  Hedges  Wood,  Leics.,  May  1905. — H.  P.  Reader. 
(1)  According  to  Bab.  Man.,  Ed.  IX.,  this  should  be  sub- 
glabrous  ;  the  present  plant  is  very  hairy.  Mr.  Beeby 
once  remarked  to  me  that  the  species  was  trimorphic,  and 
that  he  did  not  believe  in  the  alleged  variety. — E.S.M. 
The  small-flowered  form  is  nearly  as  common  in  Leics.  as 
the  type,  and  is  usually  found  in  close  proximity  thereto. 
— W.B. 
Ajuga  Chamcepitys,  Schreb.  (1)  Open  place  in  wood, 
Headley  Lane,  Surrey,  v.c.  17,  Aug.  7,  1905. — A.  Loydell. 
(2)  Near  Box  Hill,  Dorking,  Surrey,  July,  1905.— E.  Clemin- 
shaw.  (3)  BucklandHill, Surrey, Aug.21, 1905. — C.E. Salmon. 
(4)  Barton,  Beds.,  v.c.  30,  Sept.,  1905. — D.  M.  Higgins. 
Plantago  major,  L.,  var.  intermedia  (Gilib).  Near 
Billesdon  Coplow,  Leics.,  July  31,  1905,  and  Cropston 
Reservoir,  Leics.,  v.c.  55,  July  22,  1905. — A.  R.  Horwood. 
Both  gatherings  correct. — E.S.M.  Correct. — E.F.L. 
P.  lanceolata,  L.,  var.  Timbali,  Reichb.  fil.  (1)  Queni- 
borough,  Leics.,  v.c.  55,  July  6,  1905,  and  cultivated  fields, 
Beacon  Hill,  Leics.,  June  15,  1905. — A.  R.  Horwood. 
(2)  Cader  Road,  Dolgelley,  Merionethsh.,  v.c.  48,  Sept.  2, 
1905. — W.  A.  Vice.  Mr.  Horwood’s  plants  seem  to  be  just 
between  type  and  the  variety. — E.S.M.  Mr.  Horwood’s 
plant  comes  near  my  S.  France  specimen  in  the  heads, 
but  is  not  identical,  still  less  in  the  leaves.  Unfortunately 
the  descriptions  in  our  Floras  do  not  assist  in  distinguish¬ 
ing  P.  Timbali,  Jord.,  and  P.  lanceolata.  By  these  most 
plants  in  cultivated  land  would  be  under  the  former.  The 
Dolgelley  plant  I  hardly  think  can  go  to  the  introduced 
variety. — E.F.L. 
P.  Coronopus,  L.,  var.  ceratophyllum  (Rap.).  Sandy 
shore,  Skegness,  N.  Lines.,  v.c.  54,  June  13,  1905. — A.  R. 
Horwood.  Not  mature  enough  to  test  by  the  principal 
character,  in  the  fruit ;  by  the  other,  less  distinctive 
characters,  it  seems  to  be  the  type  and  not  the  variety. — 
E.F.L. 
