107 
This  is  my  S.  [Statice]  line ari folia,  var.  planifolia 
(Syme).  G.  C.  Druce  in  litt.  Mr.  Arthur  Bennett  con¬ 
sidered  the  leaves  too  narrow  for  Syme’s  variety.  It  is 
not  quite  a  usual  coast-form. — E.  S.  Marshall. 
Primula  acaulis,  L.,  var.  caulescens,  Koch.  Hill  Top 
Farm,  Ledbury,  Herefordsh.,  v.c.  86,  April  15,  1906.— S.  H. 
Bickham.  Yes. — A.  Ley.  I  agree  to  your  Primula  as 
being  P.  acaulis ,  var.  caulescens.  The  flowers  of  Primrose 
are  usually  on  a  short  submerged  peduncle  which  is  rarely 
exserted  and  so  caulescent. — E.F.L.  in  litt. 
P.  scotica ,  Hook.  Durness,  W.  Sutherland,  v.c.  108 
Aug.  11,  1906.— F.  C.  Crawford. 
Lysimachia  thyrsiflora ,  Ait.  Stormont  Loch,  near  Blair¬ 
gowrie,  E.  Perthsh.,  v.c.  89,  July  6,  1906.— E.  S.  Marshall. 
Lovely  specimens  of  a  plant  badly  wanted. — S.H.B. 
Trientalis  europ&a,  L.  (1)  Townhill  Wood,  Dunferm¬ 
line,  Fifesh.,  v.c.  85,  June  14,  1900.— F.  C.  Crawford.  (2) 
Woods  at  Culter,  S.  Aberdeensh.,  v.c.  92,  July  4,  1906. _ 
M.  Skene.  All  very  good  specimens. — S.H.B. 
Erythrcea  littoralis,  Fr.  Pegwell  Bay,  E.  Kent,  v.c. 
15.  Sent  in  case  it  may  be  a  new  v.c.  record. _ F.  L 
Foord-Kelcey.  No .—E.  pulchella,  Fr.— S.H.B.  and  A.L. 
Ceitainly  not  littoralis .  It  is  pulchella ,  which  is  recorded 
from  Pegwell  Bay  in  G.  E.  Smith’s  “Cat.  PI.  in  S.  Kent,” 
(1829).  These  plants  are  probably  the  “forma  subelongata” 
of  Wittrock.— C.E.S. 
Gentiana  germanica ,  Willd.  Harlington,  Beds.,  v.c. 
30,  Aug.  14,  1906. — D.  M.  Higgins. 
Pneumaria  maritima,  Hill.  (1)  Sea-shore,  Dounreay 
Caithness,  v.c.  109,  Aug.  16,  1906.— F.  C.  Crawford.  (2) 
Giavel-beach,  W.  of  St.  John’s  Point,  Co.  Down,  July  15, 
1902.  Coll.  R.  LI.  Praeger.  Comm.  C.  H.  Waddell. 
Myosotis  arvensis ,  Lam.,  var.  umbrosa,  Bab.  Under 
shaded  hedgerows,  S.  Croxton,  Leics.,  v.c.  55,  May  30, 
1906.  The Ms.  were  as  conspicuous  as  those  of  M.  sylvatica, 
to  which  it  bears  a  homceomorphic  resemblance  until 
examined  more  closely  ;  but  in  the  process  of  drying  they 
quickly  lose  their  character.  The  variety  seems  to  be  a 
much  taller,  more  hirsute  and  more  robust  form  of  the 
t)'Pe,  the  general  facies  being  quite  distinct,  apart  from  the 
emphasized  difference  in  the  flowers. — A.  R.  Horwood.  Yes. 
