224 
Impatiens  biflora  Walt.  Boxmoor,  Herts.,  v.c.  20, 
Sept.  8,  1907. — D.  M.  Higgins. 
Trifolium  agrarium  L.  Cultivated  field,  Hutton-le- 
Hole,  N.E.  Yorks.,  v.c.  62,  Aug.  17,  1909.— A.  J.  Crosfield. 
Correct. — E.S.M. 
Lotus  corniculatus  L.,  var.  crassifolius  Pers.  (1)  Sand¬ 
hills,  New  Brighton,  Cheshire,  v.c.  58,  May  and  June,  1908. 
— E.  &  H.  Drabble.  Yes.— A.L.  Seems  right.— E.F.L. 
Apparently  correct.— E.S.M.  (2)  Herne  Bay,  E.  Kent, 
v.c.  15,  July,  1909. — W.  R.  Sherrin.  Probably  correct. — 
A.L.  Quite  likely.— E.F.L.  Right,  I  believe.  But  I 
suspect  that  the  alleged  variety  is  no  more  than  a  “  state,” 
the  thickened  foliage  being  due  to  its  habitat.  -E.S.M. 
This  does  not  appear  to  be  so  extreme  as  the  plants  I  have 
collected  on  the  Cheshire  and  Lincolnshire  coasts.  In 
addition  to  its  fleshy  leaves  crassifolius,  as  I  know  it,  has 
larger  and  brighter  yellow  flowers  than  the  thin-leaved 
inland  form.  I  quite  agree  with  Mr.  Marshall  in  regarding 
crassifolius  as  a  mere  “  state.” — E.D. 
Coronilla  varia  L.  Roadside  banks,  Kirkliston,  Lin- 
lithgowsh.,  v.c.  84,  July  2,  1909.— McT.  Cowan,  jun. 
Vicia  Cracca  L.,  var.  villosa  (Roth).  Refuse  banks, 
riverside,  Belgrave,  Leics.,  v.c.  55,  July,  1909.  With 
Bromus  unioloides.  New  County  record.  This  appears 
about  intermediate  between  forms  from  Iver,  Bucks. 
(Druce)  and  Minehead,  Som.  (Loydell).— W.  Bell.  If  this 
plant  is  not  perennial,  I  think  it  is  rightly  named.  V. 
villosa  (Roth)  is  annual  or  biennial. — E.F.L.  Yes,  this 
is  V.  villosa  Roth  (1793)  which,  with  Keller  and  Schinz 
and  other  botanists,  I  consider  quite  distinct  from  V.  varia 
Host  (1827)  =  V.  dasycarpa  Tenore  (1829).— H.S.T. 
V.  melanops  Sibth.  &  Sm.  Rubble  ground,  near 
Ledbury,  Herefordsh.,  v.c.  36,  April  30,  1909.— S.  H. 
Bickham.  I  believe  this  rare  plant  from  Southern  and 
S.  Eastern  Europe  to  be  correctly  named,  particularly  as 
the  two  superior  calyx-teeth  are  short  and  connivant  and 
the  standard  is  glabrous  ;  though  all  the  calyx-teeth  are 
longer  than  usual,  and  in  this  respect  and  in  the  8  pairs 
of  leaflets  (5 — 7  in  melanops)  this  specimen  resembles 
V .  pannonica  Crantz,  purpuras cens  DC.  (1813).  In  1904 
I  found  V.  pannonica  in  a  half-made  road  at  Kew.  The 
