241 
19,  1909.  Gathered  with  Rev.  A.  Ley. — S.  H.  Bickham. 
(3)  Under  Yew  hedge  on  limestone  soil  (alt.  about  650  ft.),  on 
one  of  the  Cotswolds,  at  “  Highlands,”  Amberley,  W.  Glos., 
v.c.  84,  Aug.  2,  1909. — F.  L.  Foord-Kelcey.  My  specimen 
has  nothing  to  do  with  serratifrons ,  but  is  H.  sciaphilum 
Uechtr.,  var.  transiens  Ley. — A.L.  The  specimen  sent 
me  is  near  H.  sciaphilum  Uechtr.,  and  far  from  serrati¬ 
frons,  but  as  it  has  only  one  inferior  head,  it  is  not  worth 
examining. — E.F.L. 
H.  serratifrons  Almq.,  var.  torticeps  Dahlst.  Great 
Doward  Hill,  Herefordsh.,  v.c.  36,  July  2,  1909.  I  am 
sorry  the  sheets  are  so  few.- — A.  Ley. 
H.  Pictoru?n  Linton.  (Ref.  No.  3435).  Glascarnoch 
River,  near  Aultguish  Inn,  E.  Ross,  v.c.  106,  July  6,  1909. 
Coll.  W.  A.  Shoolbred.  Comm.  E.  S.  Marshall.  Styles 
livid;  ligule-tips  glabrous.  Named  by  Rev.  E.  F.  Linton. 
Yes. — A.L. 
H.  rotundatum  Kit.  (Ref.  No.  3455).  Beallach  Corrie, 
Wyvis  Forest,  E.  Ross,  v.c.  106  (at  about  2000  feet),  July 
22,  1909.  Flowers  deep  yellow;  styles  livescent ;  ligules 
very  ciliate ;  buds  senescent.  Leaves  thin,  blotched. 
Previously  only  known  in  Britain  from  Forfarshire  ;  in 
all  essentials  a  very  good  match  with  my  Clova  specimens. 
Messrs.  Ley  and  Linton  concur. — E.  S.  Marshall. 
H.  vulgatum  Fr.,  var.  sejunctum  W.  R.  Linton.  (Ref. 
Nos.  3456,  3457).  Railway  banks  and  rocks,  Kyle  of  Loch 
Alsh  and  Duirinish,  W.  Ross,  v.c.  105,  July  9,  1909. — 
Coll.  W.  A.  Shoolbred.  Comm.  E.  S.  Marshall.  No.  3456, 
styles  livid.  No.  3457,  styles  faintly  livid.  Both  gather¬ 
ings  are  so  named  by  Rev.  E.  F.  Linton  ;  the  head-clothing 
being  alike,  and  the  stem-leaves  only  one  or  two.  He 
remarks  that  No.  3456  tends  towards  var.  subfasciculare 
W.  R.  Linton,  which  var.  and  sejunctum  are  difficult  to 
separate.  I  am  quite  satisfied  that  most  of  the  specimens 
are  correctly  named. — E.S.M.  Yes. — A.L. 
H.  maculatum  Sm.  Lindfield,  E.  Sussex,  v.c.  14, 
June  23,  1909. — R.  S.  Standen.  Not  H.  maculatum 
Sm.,  but  H.  Sommerfeltii  Lindeb.,  var.  splendens  F.  J. 
Hanb.  This  is  a  very  unexpected  find  in  Sussex,  and  if 
native  is  the  first  lowland  station  in  which  the  plant  has 
