402 
Ledebour,in  the  “  Flora  Rossica,”  has  well  distinguished 
the  two  species,  and  complete  descriptions,  with  remarks 
on  the  forms  which  occur  both  in  the  wild  and  naturalised 
state  will  be  found  in  the  writer’s  “  Revision  of  the  Genus 
Symphytum  ”  in  the  “  Journal  of  the  Linnean  Society, 
(Botany)  XU,  Dec.  1918.” — Cedric  Bucknall. 
Solanum  Dulcamara  L.,  var.  marinum  Bab.  Shingle, 
Bordeaux,  Guernsey,  Aug.  11,  1912. — W.  C.  Barton.  Yes  ; 
but  it  would  be  worth  while  to  ascertain,  by  growing  this 
in  ordinary  garden  soil,  whether  the  difference  from  type 
is  permanent,  or  merely  due  to  local  conditions. — E.S.M. 
S.  triflorum  Nutt.  Alien  from  N.  America.  Wapping 
Wharf,  Bristol,  N.  Somerset,  v.c.  6,  Aug.  22,  1912. — 
J.  W.  White.  Correct. — S.T.D. 
Verbascum  [nigrum  L.] .  Sandhills,  Devonshire  Road, 
St.  Anne’s-on-the-Sea,  W.  Lancs.,  v.c.  60,  July  18,  1912.  I 
think  this  species  has  not  been  recorded  for  vice  county  60. 
— Charles  Bailey.  Certainly  not  V.  nigrum.  I  do  not  know 
this  alien. — E.S.M. 
Antirrhinum  magus  L.  St.  Ann’s  hill,  Luton,  Beds., 
v.c.  30,  June  1912. — D.  M.  Higgins. 
Veronica  hybrida  L.  River-side  rock,  under  Leigh 
Woods,  Bristol,  N.  Somerset,  v.c.  6,  July  6,  1912.  New 
county  record.  It  is  only  this  past  summer  that  a  few 
plants  have  become  established  on  the  Somerset  side  of 
the  Avon. — Ida.  M.  Roper.  Miss  Roper  sends  one  specimen 
for  identification.  This  confirms  the  queried  record  in 
“  Top.  Bot.,”  ed.  II.,  p.  288  ;  which  is  most  satisfactory. — 
E.S.M. 
V.  Anagallis- aquatic  a  L.,  var.  anagalliformis  (Bor.). 
Gleaston  Beck,  outlet  of  Urswick  Tarn,  Dalton-in-Furness, 
N.  Lancs.,  v.c.  69,  Sept.  1912 _ Coll.  D.  Lumb.  Comm.  J. 
Comber.  What  has  been  so  called  in  Britain ;  the  glandular 
plant,  which  I  have  found  very  constant  in  its  stations. 
Boreau  does  not  mention  it  in  his  “  FI.  du  cent,  de  la  Fr.,”  ed. 
I.,  vol.  II.,  p.  371  (1840);  but  Rouy  (FI.  de  France,  XI,  p.  38), 
who  cites  it  as  var.  S.  anagallidiformis  Franchet,  refers  it 
to  Boreau’s  second  edition,  p.  489  (as  V.  anagallidiformis), 
so  it  seems  to  have  been  misspelt.  Professor  Hugo  Gluck 
names  several  of  my  series  simply  “  good  V.  aquatica 
