403 
Bernh.”,  ignoring  the  glandular  inflorescence.  Bernhardi’s 
species  is  placed  by  Rouy  as  his  ‘Race  I.’,  which  I  believe 
means  an  intermediate  rank  between  a  subspecies  and  an 
ordinary  variety. — E.S.M. 
Euphrasia  nemorosa  H.  Mart.,  form.  Groby,  Leics., 
v.c.  55,  July  1912. — A.  R.  Horwood.  This  appears  to  be 
shade-grown,  or  to  have  been  drawn  up  amongst  other 
herbage — C.B.  Rather  mouldy,  but  seems  to  be  E.  curta 
Wettst.,  var.  glabrescens  Wettst. — E.  &  H.  D.  This  is  the 
‘ nemorosa ’  of  Mr.  Townsend,  who  is  followed  by  Mi. 
Bucknall ;  but  not  of  Wettstein,  who  says  in  his  Monograph 
that  E.  nemorosa  is  quite  glabrous.  These  examples  have 
somewhat  pilose  leaves  and  bracts  ;  they  come  under 
E.  curta  Wettst.,  var.  glabrescens  Wettst. !— E.S.M. 
E- - ?  Chalk  pit  between  Haslingfield  &  Barrington 
Cambs,  v.c.  29,  Aug.  1912.— G.  Goode.  E.  stricta  Host.— 
E.  &  H.  D.  Three  specimens  are  E.  curta ,  glabrescens ; 
the  fourth  is  probably  another  form  of  this,  but  the  stem 
is  remarkably  stout,  and  the  foliage  unusually  large _ E.S.M. 
I  have  come  to  the  conclusion  that  both  this  and  Mr. 
Horwood’s  plant  are  E.  nemorosa ,  although  so  different  in 
appearance.  This  difference  is  probably  due  entirely  to 
situation.  In  both  there  are  very  slender  lower  branches, 
which  I  think  are  only  found  in  E.  nemorosa. _ C.B. 
Eai  tsia  Odontites  Huds.,  var.  ?  Chalk  pit  between 
Haslingfield  and  Barrington,  Cambs.,  v.c.  29,  July  &  Aug. 
1912.  G.  Goode.  B.  Odontites  Huds.,  var.  serotina 
(Dum.). — C.B. 
Orobanche  rubra  Sm.  On  wild  thyme,  half  a  mile 
west  of  Lizard  Lighthouse,  W.  Cornwall,  v.c.  1,  June  1912 
—A.  M.  Geldart. 
Utricularia  Bremii  Heer.  In  ditch  or  drain  in  a  peat 
moss,  between  Haverthwaite  &  Cark,  N.  Lancs.,  v.c.  69, 
Sept.  1912. — J.  Comber.  I  think  correct. _ J.G.  The 
separate  flowers  agree  with  specimens  sent  me  by  Dr. 
Gluck,  but  the  bladders  are  larger  than  in  his  specimens.— 
A.B  I  have  no  good  flowering  material  for  comparison ; 
but  this  very  closely  resembles  specimens  lately  sent  me 
by  Prof.  Gluck  from  Hanau,  Hesse,  as  well  as  my  barren 
plants  from  Moss  of  Inshoch,  near  Nairn,  v.c.  96,  and 
