154 



Bulletin 35 



302 



these are in my opinion forms of the one Species which following 

 Carrick Moore I called V. paphia that being the name of the re- 

 cent representative of the Group. 



Venus halidona. — Dall. 

 Flor. Foss. Pt. vi, page 1307 PL xxxviii, F. 1, ia. 

 An imperfect specimen from which much of the Shell has 

 been removed. 



Vemis blandiana. — Guppy. 

 Geological Magazine 1874, P. 444 PI. xvii, F. 8. 

 This is included here to complete the L,ist but no specimens 

 were found at Springvale. See my Paper on the Tamana Fossils 

 1909. 



Page 12 



Cytherea planivieta. — Guppy. 

 Journ. Geol. Soc. 1866, P. 292 PI. xviii F. 3. 

 The figure is poor and barely conveys an Idea of the Shell 

 whose affinities are indicated at the Page cited. 



Dosinia liogona. — Daul. 

 Florida Fossils Pt. vi, P. 1230 PI. liv, F. 11. 



Telina sagrce . — Orb. 

 Gupp3^, Journ. Geol. Soc. 1876, Page 530. 

 Telina constricta Gab. 



Metis trinitaria Dal. Flor. Foss. Pt. v, P. 1041, PI. xlvi 

 F. 24. 



Dall suggests that D'Orbigny's "Paleontologie de Cuba" 

 was never published. Although it was incomplete I consulted it 

 at the British Museum Library during my investigation of the 

 Haitian, Jamaican and Trinidadian Fossils. I have little Doubt 

 that the Figure of T. sag7 r <z given by D'Orbigny was intended to 

 represent the species before us, which resembles T. biplicata 

 Conrad and T. sobralensis Sharp, among tertiary Fossils and T. 

 constricta and T. gruneri among living shells. In Carrick 



