Prüfung der Gutachten 1—51 der 

 Internationalen Nomenklaturkommission. 



Von 



Franz Poche, Wien. 



Inhaltsübersicht. 



Sette 



Vorbemerkungen 2 



[Gutachtenl] : The meaning of the vvord „indication" in Art. 25a 3 

 4] : Status of Certain Names published as Manu- 



script Names 7 



6: In Case of a Genus A Linnaeus, 1758, with 



Two Species, Ab and Ac 9 



7: Opinion Rendered on the Interpretation of the 

 Expression ,,n. g., n. sp." Under Art. 30a . . 9 

 16: The Status of Prebinominal Specific Names 

 (Published prior to 1758) Under Art. 30d . 11 



19: Plesiops vs. Pharopteryx 12 



20: Shall the Genera of Gronow, 1763, be Accepted ? 13 

 23: Aspro vs. Cheilodipterus, or Ambassis ... 15 

 24: Antennarius Commerson, 1798, and Cuvier, 



1817, vs. Histrio Fischer, 1813 15 



26: Cypsilurus vs. Cypselurus 16 



29: Pachynathus vs. Pachygnathus 16 



33: The Type of the Genus Rutilus Rafinesque, 



1820 17 



„ 37: Shall the Genera of Brisson's „Ornithologia", 



1760, be Accepted 19 



38: On the Status of the Latin Names in Tunstall, 



1771 20 



39 : On the Status of the Latin Names in Cuvier, 1800 21 



41: Athlennes vs. Ablennes 22 



48: The Status of Certain Generic Names of Birds 



Published by Brehm in Isis, 1828 and 1830 . 23 

 51 : Shall the Names of Museum Calonnianum, 1797, 



be Accepted? 24 



Allgemeine Betrachtungen über die Gutachten 27 



Erörterung der Mittel, durch die Herr Stiles in seiner Kom- 

 mission eine Majorität für seine oft nachweislich un- 

 richtigen Entscheidungen erlangt 29 



Zusammenfassung 32 



Literaturverzeichnis 37 



Archiv für Naturgeschichte 

 1914. A. 1. 



1 1. H«lt 



