248 Dr. Plukenett to Mr. Ray. 



veftri Tragi in quibufdam accedens^ J. B. as may be: 

 feen in his Hiftory, p. 109. And if ever my Cata- 

 logue fee Light, thefe Things will be better ex- 

 plained. 



1 y. I thank you for your kind Information about the 

 Cambrian Ferns -> yet methinks I cannot but be fteady 

 to the Title of Filix pumila Myrrhidis facie^ it being 

 a Name that in few Words fo graphically denotes the 

 thing itfelf. 



16. The Shrub that grew in Mr. Wilkinforfs Gar- 

 den coming in fome Difguife, and in a different 

 Face from what I had from Carolina^ had like in- 

 deed to have put upon me 5 but after it was grav'd, 

 I acquainted Dr. Robinfon with my Sufpicions about 

 it, and if you pleafe to remind, you will find a Note 

 upon it amidft its Synonymaj which, tho' it be put 

 there only as a Variety, the Hint may be fufficiently 

 underftood, as indeed 1 would have it : And it is the 

 only double Overfight (I think) committed in the 

 whole Work. 



17. As for ydur Sufpiciofr of my mifapplying Sy- 

 nonyma to the Alth. profundi ferrato S. dent at 0 folio ? 

 J. B. it will be foon taken off, when I fliall tell you 

 that my Opinion is, the tfhuringiaca Camerario ejufd. 

 J. B. is the feif-fame thing, tho' he feems to make 

 them two, but with a great deal of Vacillation and 

 wavering. And now you'll find Cafp. Bauh, Syno- 

 nyma here ufed, reconcilable enough to what it was 

 intended, and Cluftus's Names will fall in pat, as you 

 would have them. 



18. If your Ledum Alpinum hirfut. win. Cat. Exte- 

 ror. be my Ciftus Chamterhododendros, &c it is very 

 different from the Ciftus pumilus Montis Baldi^ &jV. 

 J. B. tho' this be a Chamcerhododendros too, as being 

 a Monopetaloidj having but one Leaf, with fome Top 

 Divifion in the Flower. 



1 p. My Polygonum minus procumbens niveum Glaucis 

 exigux fol, is undoubtedly the Pglygala repens nuperor* 



Lob. 



