﻿16 
  

  

  PROCEEDINGS 
  OF 
  THE 
  NATIONAL 
  MUSEUM 
  

  

  VOL. 
  67 
  

  

  Antennal 
  tubercles 
  prominent. 
  Width 
  of 
  head 
  through 
  eyes, 
  

   0.464 
  mm. 
  Beak 
  reaching 
  second 
  coxae. 
  Cornicles, 
  0.56 
  mm. 
  long; 
  

   reticulate 
  for 
  0.08 
  mm.; 
  imbricated; 
  widest 
  diameter 
  0.064 
  mm., 
  

   smallest 
  diameter 
  0.048 
  mm.; 
  flange, 
  0.064 
  mm.; 
  cauda 
  0.208 
  mm. 
  

   long, 
  conical 
  not 
  constricted, 
  three 
  sets 
  of 
  lateral 
  hairs. 
  

  

  Pupa, 
  alate 
  viviparous 
  female. 
  — 
  Antennal 
  measurements: 
  

  

  Cornicles 
  0.496 
  mm. 
  long, 
  flanged, 
  slightly 
  swollen. 
  

  

  This 
  species 
  was 
  first 
  recorded 
  from 
  Corylus. 
  Davidson 
  recently 
  

   told 
  me 
  that 
  he 
  doubts 
  if 
  Corylus 
  is 
  an 
  important 
  food 
  plant, 
  it 
  being 
  

   much 
  more 
  common 
  on 
  ninebark. 
  

  

  Host 
  plants. 
  — 
  Corylus 
  rostrata, 
  Physocarpus 
  capitatus. 
  

  

  Distribution. 
  — 
  California. 
  

  

  Cotypes. 
  — 
  Deposited 
  in 
  U. 
  S. 
  National 
  Museum. 
  Cat. 
  No. 
  26854. 
  

  

  AMPHOROPHORA 
  COSMOPOLITANA 
  new 
  name 
  

  

  Figs. 
  14-26 
  and 
  33-44 
  

  

  Aphis 
  lactucae 
  Kaltenbach, 
  Mongr. 
  der 
  Familien 
  der 
  Pflanzenlause, 
  1843, 
  

   p. 
  37. 
  

  

  Aphis 
  lactucae 
  (Linnaeus) 
  Walker, 
  Ann. 
  Nat. 
  Hist., 
  ser. 
  2, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  1849, 
  

   p. 
  49. 
  

  

  Rhopalosiphum 
  ribis 
  (Linnaeus), 
  Koch, 
  Die 
  Pflanzenlause 
  Aphiden, 
  1854, 
  

   p. 
  39. 
  — 
  Buckton, 
  British 
  Aphides, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  1879, 
  p. 
  9. 
  — 
  Lowe, 
  Geneva 
  

   Agr. 
  Exp. 
  Sta. 
  Bull. 
  139, 
  1897, 
  p. 
  663. 
  — 
  Van 
  der 
  Goot. 
  Beit, 
  zur 
  Kennt. 
  

   der 
  Hollandischen 
  Blattlause, 
  1915, 
  p. 
  146. 
  

  

  Rhopalosiphum 
  lactucae 
  (Kaltenbach) 
  Passerini, 
  Aphidida? 
  Italicae, 
  1863, 
  

   p. 
  20. 
  — 
  Walker, 
  The 
  Zoologist, 
  ser. 
  2, 
  no. 
  53, 
  1870, 
  p. 
  1997.— 
  Ferrari, 
  

   Ann. 
  del 
  Mus. 
  Civ. 
  di 
  Stor. 
  Natur. 
  di 
  Genova, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  1872, 
  p. 
  60.— 
  

   Buckton, 
  British 
  Aphides, 
  vol. 
  2, 
  1879, 
  p. 
  10. 
  — 
  Macchiati, 
  Bull, 
  della 
  

   Soc. 
  Entom. 
  Ital., 
  vol. 
  14, 
  1892, 
  p. 
  244. 
  — 
  Sanderson, 
  Canad. 
  Ent., 
  vol. 
  

   33, 
  1901, 
  p. 
  70. 
  — 
  Schouteden, 
  Mem. 
  de 
  la 
  Soc. 
  Entom. 
  de 
  Belg., 
  vol. 
  

   12, 
  1906, 
  p. 
  236. 
  — 
  Davidson, 
  Journ. 
  Econ. 
  Ent., 
  1910, 
  p. 
  377. 
  — 
  Essig, 
  

   Pomona 
  Journ. 
  Ent., 
  vol. 
  3, 
  1911, 
  p. 
  463. 
  — 
  Theobald, 
  Journ. 
  Econ. 
  

   Biol., 
  vol. 
  7, 
  1912, 
  p. 
  105.— 
  Patch, 
  Maine 
  Agr. 
  Exp. 
  Sta. 
  Bull. 
  225, 
  1914, 
  

   p. 
  53. 
  — 
  Mordvilko, 
  Fauna 
  de 
  la 
  Russie, 
  livr. 
  2, 
  1914, 
  pp. 
  51, 
  58. 
  — 
  

   Gillette 
  and 
  Bragg, 
  Journ. 
  Econ. 
  Ent., 
  vol. 
  8, 
  1915, 
  p. 
  100. 
  — 
  Dobrov- 
  

   kiansky, 
  A 
  List 
  of 
  Aphids 
  Found 
  on 
  Cultivated 
  Plants 
  in 
  the 
  Govern- 
  

   ment 
  of 
  Kharkov, 
  Bull, 
  on 
  Pests 
  of 
  Agr. 
  Khorkov, 
  1916. 
  — 
  Tullgren, 
  

   Aleddelande 
  fran 
  Centrolanstalten 
  for 
  Jorsbrukforsch, 
  Entomologiska 
  

   andelmingen, 
  no. 
  27, 
  1916, 
  p. 
  104. 
  — 
  Theobald, 
  Fruit, 
  Flower 
  and 
  Vege- 
  

   table 
  Trades 
  Journ. 
  London, 
  Oct. 
  13, 
  1917. 
  — 
  Essig, 
  Univ. 
  Cal. 
  Pub. 
  

   Ent., 
  vol. 
  1, 
  no. 
  7, 
  1917, 
  p. 
  331. 
  — 
  Quaintance 
  and 
  Baker, 
  U. 
  S. 
  Dept. 
  

  

  