.in tbe «mfw!Ry, <b« pi. takiof (wur-ij', bur-*)- Thu is -prohjibly 



one of the ilialectie confusions of fonii cojnmoii h\ the northern ilmlect« 

 niid it may luLve htid its orighi in the southern use of the plurala ho- 

 norific loriiis of the singular. It ma), however, have b^en the feit). 

 Jform ol' tJie stngiUiu- with-r for-/. In Australian, Yeniceiiui, Scythic, 

 JJ. E. A.^iati iUiil Seinitito-Libyan the labial defjoitive ao frequently 

 occurt* wHb a final liquid io the singular thut it is necessary to recognize 

 thiLi cjcistenci' of this form as & very ardiaic one (bal, bar, wal, val, mal, 

 man, bari, buli &c. &c.) There are even strong rt-iiJ^oui! tor holdin>r tbjit 

 this particle and the liquid or, ro, ri, la &e were priruarily idontieid and 

 tltat the liual and plural function of the latter was Heooudiary, and acqiur- 

 ed i'rum the use ot the labial defiaitive in its various full and cuntracii^ 

 loruu (e. g. bar, barir ba, ar, ri, 11, m kc) m the biuuotuI *'two," 



11m XTumerals. 



The new Nilg^irt and Vindyan seriet have led me to adopt Bon)« modi- 

 fication of the analy.sis in Cliap. v. The reasouB will be found in the aec. 

 oil the Molt- Anam nuiiieruU in Clinp. vi 



1. Tbe Drsiiv. on-rw 1, I now read o-nrM, and identify the root with 

 TO of the 1 <jf Toda vo^^lda, Ti^liiir, \o-ht'fif .Nilo^ii vo^tdn^ vo-ddef and 

 the coth, pa, bu of H), \>a'ku-iin &c. (p. SfiT. Yeruknin has vo-ndu 

 ^n-ndtJ Karn, The MuIh pu-Kf/w-Hj?, (i-ndo'/tff 1 are siniihir forms. Coittp. 

 aUo the ThIultu va-mlu 100. The Kol and Mon-Auam mo-i &c, 1 is tho 

 aume root, with a ditfertiut Drov. poea. postf. 



2. era-rfu and the variations in 2 and hi|;-her numlwra I now read e.m- 

 du, e.d, Irtt^ e.r Sec. e, i bein^ the sole remnant of the ultimate root, 

 whiDliin its oldeat form had ra, rtt, only as a postf. or ^eeoud ol**ment, 

 bat ttfterwarda superadd<'d &c,, probably ou the earlier pu!*tf. con- 

 creting with the root, remiiant, Uraon ban e-no a, ino*no 3. From the 

 ffidle ami frequent elisoo of the initial labial it ia probable that the full 

 fonu of the initial root was b*-, hi. (p. fiO). The form he-ra &u\ ajrreeB with 

 the Kol bn.t'j and tJuU ha is die irntial rootiind r a second eleiuent tn" m 

 po:<ttix in bar appearii from its offurrinfr with the ^uttunil |wi:*tlix in Sa»- 

 vara, bti-ffu, n furjn preserved al.^o in 7 of Yerukiila vo-//«, Kinnili hba- 

 O'lfa and Mon bu-^ (2 for 5), and identical with theTfihi^ju vn-fta of vo- 

 ku'ti 1 rD.1 the wjm. 6. Drav. 10. It is probable tiiat io he.m See. 2, ra wa* 

 a gecoud archaic definitive or unit. 



4. If 2 bo e.i'iudtt 4 muat l>e na-Zw, i. e. the secondary element 

 ip-itliilut the initial onf». The Kol po.n refiiiuij the root of 1 with the 

 cont;r''ted con.^onant of the second element or prirntiry jHutt', The form 

 opun-m is probably from op-pu.rt^, i.e. op 3, pu.n 1, I'lie Savma coa* 

 traeted form uf 4,' vo.n-;;;* (I for 3, 1) m evidently the full form of th« 

 "Toluva n.n-ji 1. 



5. The Gudaba mo4Ui-yi con:firm8 the ftQalyaia of the Kol mu-na, 

 Stto-r lis li (S, Dmv, mu-dii kc.) for 3, 2* 



8, e-Hfw (iioten iiB in 2, 



Tiie Kol irl rtp[>earj4 to be radically i.r-/, a contraction of tliB S, Drav. 

 i.vn-du =i.tn4u. 



The exceptional Good, Teluiu and Tuluva forma must, in conformity 

 with the amended analysis of % be read a.na-mo*r, e.ni-mi-rfi, e.nu-ma 

 i. t-, u.na, e.na, e.ni ^, uud iiuiT} Soi'Uif ma 10 ia tli« Ibm of tU« tUUt 

 fomd. m Ibis K»i o> ii. l>f av. U &6. 



