44 BTlllTOLOaT OF THE INDO-rAClFiC IltAKDS. 



iba Bait 



ibu Kantlajan 



iwo Mandhar 



IIL TiBETO-UtTRAlNDlAK* 



A. Emt Tih&Lm or Si-Jan. 

 mn-re Gyarung 

 nan Changlo, Kami 



nang Bodo, Garo, Mikir, Singpho, Burman, Kby- 

 eng, Kumi, Naga (Namsang, Tengsa^ Kba- 

 fij Tablung, Mithan), Magar, Cbanglo (in 

 posa. ) 



n^n Tiberkad 



ua Gyarung (poss. pref.*)^ Dbrmalj Mtkir (in 



• pl)t Singplio (In jios^.), Naugaung Naga, 



Tejigsa Nflga (in pl)^ Toung-lhu 

 no Manyab, Dophla, Abor, Deoria Chutia, An- 



gami and Mozome Angami. 

 o Namsangya Naga 



irnwo Magar(3io^*.) 

 Jiuni Tiberkad 



ani Deoria CJiuttSj lu poss. nl-^o [? Drav.] 



i Takpa 

 111 Dhimal (in ph ny-c?, poss. m-tig) Singplio (in 



pi m-theng)^ Kliari Naga (in pf. ni-Mak,) 

 i Takpa 

 ne Nameang Kaga (in pi ne-ma), Angami Naga 



(in pL na-ra-jnai also in poss. sin^.) 

 neng Burman 



meng 



men j, 



B, West Tibetan or Bhotia, 

 [The ro6t is not Cbincae in form, but I place the series here in 

 order to illustrate the mixture of systemg in the Himakyo-Ultra- 

 indian provitices. The original was probably nga, nge, ngyo, a 



• Nl fs given in the Vc«abulary (anii copied by Muller) aa the profljtual posa. 

 forra, but it appeara to he a misprint as lJod>fwn in jiotlres of the ffTamnnar 

 inTftriabij use* na-, and in a uote to the VucabuJary na- giio occuw. 



