EtflS'OLOGT or THE IN'DO PACirrC ISLANDS^. 



dian era*, hatl^efn (ruppri'Sfipdf haw moeh caotiobii a«cd(>fl in mBkTng 

 any histOTicnl ithCi't iht Hindu clirHnk-lpi*. The ihjitee in which (he ji roper 

 Hboiian gluhftiirial fi«rn3f« o( ihe J ibtt^i Ul'iaiiiiJian friiinatii-n bnvi heen 

 diffosed ii> ibe Bonrbwirfi of the Hnnulaynu sufticieruly ai*T'ftBT8 ircim 

 othur Seciifins i he ancifot or wriiipn ioims are IrtqueniJy Ifiuiid m 

 Lhops and S^rpa and »nwei\me9 in the ksn BbutiHcd lavgrnfivimi ibi 

 HIroaiayaR Tbf inudein f ruins viLbBj^^B and Di^ficbi have be«-n par* 

 tiaily J^pread by Bbtuiins amonn th« Uimalayiin i»n|jiinfic>a, Iml vt-Tf 

 few 4- xatn pi «-ti are /uund in the Middle and ^<'<.■tllll GacKeiic ur in ibfl 

 Uliifliiidiiin ian(iiift(ff9. Tbf anoeni Bhnuan fi>rroHhave hten «p»iiniily 

 cfifl'uef'tl fr 'H) Bhutan umotif^ th^< w\dd!le Gaui^etrc and ibe adiacenl 

 North UlirHirdiHn lannnaKfii . The prevalfni Uliraindian t'^iws of 

 tbi" Tibfio Uliiaindiar^ ruou iritnpitwoa fljiree wrib the Bbotian buttDori 

 fitqu^ntly iliUer frum ihr>in» and mmt ui those nhtcb nftrte wiih il ar£ ito 

 «ideJy difTu-^rd, and are, in many raftfa, o^f Eoa feapntlal a cbaracter and 

 ton intimaiely blended with ibe Ujiraindian |Kl«i8tianal Hyeteme, to bavt 

 heen refent drrivaiwiUB fri» to Tibet dr Bhutaih Mnriy have n« w been 

 faiinil iii Sifan vi^cahulnries »\m, ard it In cirar that friicb turmt Tr« re car* 

 lied trt^uth ward liy the oldest ri»i>£iaiirm» lium Tjhn, tvliich oiutst bava 

 ]oiiK prrcadrd liie Bbntian ir rnpttfna nf nur era. Ev<pry grear jeltvaRarial 

 forroalion txhthii^ a pri»|>ottion of tvtiia which prr»eive an idemiiy in 

 form in eeparaie {irorincea arid afivr an extent vt difl^iminn which it mnal 

 have laksn oiany thniitands af j*ars iti elffci. I'iie A»'»ne(nan lan;(UigM» 

 ]n their atchbic afiiDiUeti with Arncan, N. AiTstic, N. E. Aaiaiic and 

 Other reiii<}t« langm^c^i affurd eirikiDg illuairam rta til thia. 



The filoeaaries of the Ultraindtan and the ci unpcied Indian Isn^nafcei 

 are c^cefdinfily mixtd, u nec«»»Hry rehull *d the aiitKle inirn»>ive Ultra* 

 indlan race havtni; partialty blended at lea^t three dietimet lini(Ut((ij« 

 for 1X1 all una, the archaic Dravrrn. Australian wiih it? modprn N, E. Dra vi- 

 rion branch, and the itriJtmcd tfHon Anam. and Tibeto Uunriat) Every 

 sttempt at an ^act separation nf ihit rirota beloitf^inft tti tbete several 

 formaiions mu^il prtivR to a certain rxtent a failure, hi cause all bud ar« 

 chait? iifbnities. Thua the Dravitian had Tibetan and Chinese aflinitiet, 

 and the Mnn-Annm lanuu^tff^H iou>>t have had archaic citntiectuitiH «>itb 

 the adjnccni lHn|{ua({L>a of ibe J'lbftan fufvWy before eiiber i>f ibeaa 

 brancb^^a of the i'binn-Tih<-lan i>r Himalmc btcm wan carried over the 

 nauuntains into Ulirairidta tut} India. But ii tii poM^ible to nnake a rouuh 

 approxitnntiim to Aucb n Mffiaiaiinn. utvirj; tn tb<> circitrufiaoce of ihe 

 Tibetan T^'Cflbulsries a) ill extant in Tibet a^^^\ the Diaiuian viiCidiutarjei 

 of 8i>t](berr) Indta bavin;; pre«rerved certain pi^ninna (4 the drctent fjint* 

 larieti cf iwu of the fomiaiiunN ctJOiparaiH-ely free froua Ultraindfan 

 iniermaioie. * In ibc cone oi Tiifet it is not |!r"ballile that ma archaic 

 Vocabulnriea h^vr been tflectui by ihe non-SBr.i<t<rit laniiUHiifa ud ihit 

 ■iiie ol ibe Himatavo'?, and wlihitonh uibern india i* tuucb tnnre es* 

 pnKpi!, the u-npral rff ct tif ;ilt the ethnic pvidence is agaiDBt ibe Ultra- 

 indif-n tribea and laniiunfifs havtr(f inftuenctd the pminfuia b<-yiirid iba 

 VindV'ta 10 any noinMf extent. Il!iVir>(( already jMirijaJly iiared iba 

 Dravifi.in viTnhteg in UftTatnttia, the first step townine asreriaininn tha 

 proliable eicicrit and diflfufton of iho M-ir-Ansun (ilorsBMal rerunariis 

 will he lo teiiarats ixum the GanKetr«-lIltratniJ(an rttcabidariee ibose 

 f?ord« which clearly or prob;«lily bebnR ut the Tibetfi-tjurman fitrmdiiun. 



The Bbotiaa affioilics gf the vanous rocabulaiice A the Buroiftii fami* 



