4C^ ETHNOI-OCiY OP Tfle ISDO- PACIFIC latANDS. 



tlris form anil it^ a]>plication to tke Jfec, are sliown by the Yukn- 



luri stm bn<i'-f)ii-slm, Cauc^i^iini sun buk, buk, baak, dag i>i^'"uk, ba ; 

 MalagBjiy ski/ A«.-baka-baka, Galln .■ikif waka, wak, ffod wak-wak, 



4. Tfic auttttral Root. 



Tht* only exftinplea of the root hi the Tibptan vocabularies are the Bho- 

 tia'h khfth, Horpa kali skt/^ wbich l-i Turkish kuk, g-ok, it may be connect- 

 ed with f he Bodo no-k ho- raut^ (no kba-bir mmn,^ An^^mi kharr mwn) 

 Kambojan kor, Jfoit kyn; C'hineriK %Af, kong", kuanir Antrami Xagfa 

 ti'-khni, j!i-kht', Anam khi air. An. ki dttij, anii with thfeLau guttumlroot 

 for white khau, khoung, 



A^nitks of each diakct, 



1. Bhotian. 



The form lung", «rV, ha^ t7ie vowel of llDi-pii, Tliofhu find Takpa ; an.l 

 theaame form i:* found in the I'akjja dung*, .Xagsi nuiig sky, Kambujan lung 

 ;i-l(i linhi Jicc, 



The form lhak, rtfr, is allied to the Manyak da'. Similar forma are pre- 

 served appUed ttJ the moon Hk, le\ da, fa kc. The >Ja^n-Gan«-etic rag", 

 run;^» ra &c., air, are roferabJe to thir* tbmi of the Tibetan root, lliey 

 ajjjiejirto bave been very early dili'usedj «nd inihcatf a diritintt trausmifi- 

 siou of tlie root fitau that of the niivJeni Bhotian, The Bhotiau ifi founct 

 in itd ^jroptr form in a few of tlie ^ijjal langxiag'ea onlv. 



The Bhotian nam, sktf^ i* (tltio an archaic form. It la only found in Tak- 

 pa, and in the .south also it haa a very luirrow range, l^ut the common 

 Boutliern rsng- is the wime root in another form, 



Kbuh, Hhy, Ilorjm kob, ha? a stiJl nai'owor nunge. 



Nyi^ gun, b^also iJyarunjj: and Manyak, — Hortmand Takpa preserving" 

 the broad form, iiga, laiipr. It iriooranion in all the houtliorn j^roupa, hut 

 the pieiixeB ishow tliat thi? southern tenna were ehii^fly deiivwi iram Sifan. 



TJie fonns* of the labial root iu iti application to Jtrc occur iii the other 

 Tibetan vocabukries also* 



2. Horpa, 



The Horpa /«/-rTU, fltr, is connected ivith the Thotihu and Takpa forms. 

 Koh, alttf, has Bhotian, Moa-Anam and Chiaese affinities. 

 Kgtt, has aLio Mon-Anam re pre;*entative9 (ngai). 

 Nj^G-lpj dtiifj \A Gyarun^, Takj>u and Burman. 



Sifhfif lit/hij ii} remotely coiiuected with the Lau *i-wang, Burman mo 

 C-msh, Jire, Is also Aka. 



Like tlie Thodui and Manyak these vocables show archaic affimties both 

 with the Biu"ma-tjJan«,^etie aiid the Mon-Anam glossariea. 



3. Thochu. 



The Thochu »wj*zyu, air, i^j Miujipuri and Nipal. 



Miih-/'i ski/ ha* tm same atiinitiei? m the Manyak mah, that is it is 

 Mon-Anam rather than B anna- Gang-e tic. 



5lun, Htm, h dinjctly uounected with the Gyanmg mon, meun, $ki/f 

 und, through it., with the similar Ultniiatio-Gaiig'etic t«rms, 



JStyaklo, dtij/ is peculiar, 



Ix h Kulombi jsui imd Angaim Noga. 



