0 The 7>/;^r lifts :i rmiws. 1. <t-tajr lib, wn, tak Hh. .*/;., st-tuk iTorpa. 

 t«eTak|tii.; UhJ TljotOiu, kuiiir (ivjiruti^", .'i. It^jilif Munyuk. (>/ tliese 

 the BiiuUiiii, llyrpti unci Tiikjui w ordn are nutn f. The Thui hu uiid ( ryu- 

 runff are froiu the (iyuiui fonn khu ot' the iijij^initnt KwHtt-hwa hii, tiiul 

 the lUanyjik U m /mtive (slenilfr funn uf the uriiiriiiiil (jliint-iv^ Ju lu ^Stl^ 



Th'i hrts^ mime>-. 1- s~\frf4tfi Bli, \vr., .y/(/r-iiri <iyanin^, pr,i 



T.iki>u; 'J. tyu Uh, pp.; 2 a. /.uui-lle Morjiu, :2 //. ti byuruii«f, 

 Thodin, — the (jvamng^ hnvhip' ttn' Jiliotiun iWiii. 



The rootd }Kjsii*'^ed by vuch dialect, and the rvlutiou of pach to the othera 

 will l>e lifht .-^hywH ill u tahltr. 1 havK aiided th« uaiiuvs i'or Fii(h , SnukCf - 

 Jtirdy Crtm\ Ant and MunqniUi. (S<?i- m-xt jmye). 



Fi'tHii thii* tsible it appeara timt in the naraes fni* animalf* fomprifif'd in 

 it, there i:^ — svhni wccxchidi' thus*; ui Chiiit->s«* durivuiiuii— u t lose rjtdiml 

 a-rrKenient in uJI the vocnhularif tlie vuriatiuiw bfnii^ chicliy phyiieiif, 

 'J'he (iial«t*tic rtjfltiuuf* iiidicuteil itre ;— ■ 



l.st, ji very ijitiinate one hiftwf«ni Bhotinu and Takpi^ the latter nclher- 

 iiii: t^J lihotian tb? other dialeetj* depart from it; and the Uifforeiii-e 



beiiiy-, it almost every fu^^Kj nieivly a sliiilit pboiu^ti^' luie. iiiits^palcr 

 vtolit; tetideucy Takptt patt?ik<'j* ot the Silan pbonolofT}". 



2d, 11 connection between Bhotiaji and (Jyamn^, in th e fomi of the 

 roots* for Diifi iuid FUh^ in the rtmrs Mmikey^ Bird, t't'Mi% niid Atit, and " 

 in the jiretix in the words tbr Muniri/f Crafi' {(*. iiresiy viiig" the lull foim* 

 fitf lib. Una (<-), aiul Ant, The eon net' don h dnetiy with thr old i>r wriitea 

 Bhoiian, the words tor Jhttf^ Mn/dn/, Ihril, and Ant prt-fiervhig the old 

 lihoiiaii niutrf«»r tbrnis w hilo tlie s)iokeir Uliutiitn has lo.-^t them. 



JJdj tt very .sliirbt fnmifetion betaecu Miuiyak and nld Blu*tijin. The 

 ]\ltinvidi h-v\\ sunkt like the Takpa m-rui pre^jervai the vowel of the 

 BhJ-rul. 



4th, an arehaie sejianition between Bhotinn ancl the other di|i]ect8 save 

 TAkpft, as ;ilu>wu in the forms of iievenil of the rootii and pretiies. The special 

 cuiniei tion iniUeated nnder tlieprecedin^i- headjJi, if archaic, wouki be is in- 

 consistent witlitbe eitrly iliverjrLMur tnihcated under this head. Ir ii* aitribn- 

 tiible to the diaiectof llie BbufianHi liaviiifi' aeijuired more or less eunency in 

 the pi'dvinces td the ulher triben, dnrhif*' the perjud when the Bhot!an> w re 

 pi-edoniiiutuf, anUlhi? mii.-it have been whije the uJd phoiiolo<;y still pren idl- 

 ed. Ahi iltu.striuitiiis of the archuie yejiuration of the dialeefs, we wixLy 

 jHiint lu the dilfereut rot^t^!, or coniljinutionii of root-s, for Vitt^ ii<if^'^fj 

 Jfofilu'ifi and I'l^fi, and to thi3 differenee of the prelixes in the Blidfo- 

 Uvurung *y-roj;", A'y-rok, ilanyiik ^«-rii ^Iw^, and in if-b-rul Jlh,, AA«-b-ri 

 Cryaninir S/iulr, 



"i)th. A sp< eial connection between ITorpa and Jlojiyak,— Oif, Doff, JToffj 

 fVm', and Ci'i'W, — und tlie comparatively slight tnur uf wicli a coniifcfion 

 !i*>tv\ een llt>rjm imd Thw:hn (.v-kh-ru, (M-kh-raJnf heuiir the only exmupk'), 

 und betwteii lioipa and Gyartinfr. As this tspecial relation of llorpu to 

 JIanyak cxteuiiij to tsome other s^ubstantive words, bnt not fo the 'iironouns 

 and ihe nui.-* i*f tlieub^timt xuid ijualitive vocableii, and as the llorpa are * 

 known to be advei.iurons alid non.adic, beiiiir even now sciitterfd over 

 southern Tibet, it i.- jmbable that u llotniX bniiie at one period nnxed with 

 the Muuyaks, ai.d eoiiinnniinited to Uiem a portion ot their voaibuliiry. 

 The intercouri^O ul the iMnnyaks with the llorpa, however caused, appears - 

 to huvt: ht^eu iLioru iutimate tliuu with any other of the Tibetan tiibes. 



