iTHSor-ooT cr tite i>-uo -pacific rsLANua. 



Th(» ifufttiml prctix (►f tlie >'i['al vurieiics ami thw nnsfll Until of ^>unwar 

 slww- lliat tLey hvUm^ to th« nirlit r foiins tbr ( i.v;n iii*g-— Misiimi— . 

 Vuiiin Uunl, vt'|ire?><'itf<id by tlic TilH-i-khud khui, Mik-li. kui ami not to the 

 f.nniritu1aU'd K;»reii uud Uiinu:iii, I'lu' k jnvJix is siill luithiI in ilLshmiy 

 Kutul, Mmi, Touii<>-thu ami in Hottie f xtfjjt in Ksfn.-ii. I«> tlif Miujipirt 

 and SA'*\i dialectic ihe detiUil niid pulat^il t'onns aio iiiorf coininuu, but ka 

 is tit.ill L'un'oiit lu f^eveiid. (C]]aiu|»iimijr] LuUti[i()it, and C. Tangkhul} 



TliH Aiijiin, luij Clioug and Binua dio beloujrs to ilw aanie em. As tlie 

 MiM fi'fi'hi is excepticKwl, its |n;>jter Hniilinitii>ii to thf^ Tifjerf it i-* 



probable that it jw.Histvsod a siuiilar ntnu« I'ur the Z>w// at one time, 



3, Uou. 



L The fall Bliotiau form pbaf, pbak, is found in tJie wutlj«rn Bhotian 

 vtM-ulmlarif-ii, jjluik xSi-rpa, pb;iir-/'(' Lhopa, in Liiidm and Kirunti pba^, 

 iii Chf|Kinjf piak, (vban^lo pliuk-^w (IJiopa), Mikir pbak. 



Tbo Horpii and Manyuk fnrniit* in \v— llnr|m Viih, Maiiyak wall, of 

 wiiii^h thf oldiT fonns mn>t iisive \m n vak. u ak, — indicate thiit the most 

 mninioii ritndndian t'orw^ were of Sif'aii dmivarinn, and si.'* some q{ them 

 have tu-, it is proU'ible that {Jyaiuny had /r^-vvak, ^^^-wak or ta-vak 

 beloro it.s prtiper Tibetan vorable Wits di^pluei-d by ki- It had not received 

 ki whtMi it ^prpiid Ut Ultraitidia, for that, forui of the (;hitie.\e root ia 

 not found thvre. The. Miipir wiik, .liU ta-wnky Sin;4-pbo and Mrunj^r 

 wa, R:»khoini3'- wat, liunjum and Kyau wt-t, Khycnjjr wu(» weuk, Khyuu 

 vavik, Kunii and ivhari Xatru mvk, Kiuni au, Kami o, < iaro, JSaui.sting', 

 Mathun, .loUika and Hiik vak, Mrn ^^-pak ///-vak), .Vojimjix', Muluni^, 

 TiibhjnLf and Ten<ir?Mi ak, i"/ rfuii^pu //A-ak], Khari ank, Korcjjj^ /w-vak^ 

 Chaniplmnjti; rt-viik, liaro, iljiram, Mai in <r and Lun*fkh*Mvok| Kajtwi bok, 

 l.nkuppa, Klioibu, ^^ and C, Tanykhul liok, JS. Tmjffklml and Mnnipmi 

 ok, Aiiirnnii and M. A. thu-vo, tfu'-vu, Shindu v<i, Snownr [to, Lt pcbtt 

 iuon» LavL uiu, Bulo yf>-ma, o-ma, Dhinial pa-i/« [oonip. on^hifa horsef 

 n\iiy~ifu ntf/)il-njf pun-//a muftr, hiii-ya^/j.tit^ Khi-n (htf, ji-Afl frirrf, mr-ia 

 eh'ph'ttit A.s Anani cban^re.H tlie bilikl into the uspimte, it* 



Leo id proliablv from ikio or ueo (weak Kliyeng-). 



2. ilon //(-let, >trt-lt'ik, A-lueit, yc-bit, 'I'ayin^" Misbrri M-li, Mijhu 

 Mislimi leli, Unrun£j: /"/-li, Daplda ti-vak Pofrfn^'tl m Ab^r to ^-ve-'', 

 i-ekj VTiek [=My» lueit]^ KandH»jan cA-rok, t.-A(-rnk, Chonfi;' fAtf-mk, 

 Ka cJiU'T, Anam t-ru, Ion. This ai»pli(ation *4' the li*piid root to 

 the H'jffiA not Tibetan, and the distribution of tin* nrtuie.-* ^ll.•\vs that they 

 belong''* tt» the peculiar tlanp'to-Mon cum'nt. The broad tbnn^ ruk, luk, 

 Tok, ink, appwjr to be thi? orifrinals, let, li, yep-, bein^'- uhanieteridtiu of thfj 

 later einasmbit^'d Uyarunpr-Vtir-Umi [iboiiubijry. They are coanftcteil with 

 flu! Manipurian nanny for the Ehphoit^ bk, loak, luak I =iueit], A simi- 

 lar orclmic form iri applied jCo the J/«wArv in s^ome Manipurian dialeiU 

 and Hilonjs:, nak» lak» luit, rhu [=rbu Cut Gyannrjr]. The rt>*it is* not a 

 nativ*^ Cbinesp or Moii-Aiiam one for the //"//. It k evidently of .sroonda- 

 jy oiiLnn, unciunt a» the fonti ia. It id probahiy a cyntracliju of oue of 

 tiie older names for the Btmr^ pha^r /.ix-kik &.v.-. 



The amplitied vof^iHc form;) applied to the Jiiijf(t!(/i\ Mtwliant and Moti* 

 knj in dome vocabularieid, lui, mi, nud apptair to be coiitraotioiia of 

 forms like hieif, luak 



The Chiiie!*e root ehu, chi» tu, ti^ \vaa lieen received by Karen tlio, 

 Tvuu*^-tlm tiiitu, -Uurmi dliwa, thwi, aiid Dwriu Cliuliu chu. The Auam 



