110 ETinrOLOGT or the rSDO-PAClPlC I1LA5D». 



Hie Limp*lco, Khumi, Kynu, Knmi, Mni launpr, lounfr^Snfc Imn ; hav^m 

 different f«nn of tl(e do iiblf vowol. The Anam tui sMp is proJjfibly re- 

 ferable to it, the Kiiuilmjan ^rroiip luiviri^ tilao the dental tor tlip hf|ui(i- It 

 ia possible that these au i'onm buve a distinct orig^iii from the ua ones. 

 They resemhlo flie Intno-Uravirian nnd Asone^iian nm, pbivfi, falau k(% 



A skntler form of the root is fimrul in SiiiLrplto, Jsli, Karen, KapwT, 

 Mariiijj:, li, Rukhoiii«\ Maram, C. Tan;^''khiil Ihi, niirmtm Ihe, Uon teng, 

 Koala liiurr, <Jnro riu^- 



The /c, / prefix of Bhot,, Ilnrpa, Manyak and Takjm is found in Jili 

 tet-, Karen, IMoii, Khvf'nj.'' k/t-f w-, Mikir In Aka it. bn^c^im^s 

 in Notriiunt^' Xa-rn in Kljyen^ /«/-,- Lhopajuid Changlo hav*- d-; tJii* 

 liibial of Thochu aikJ Oyar. occurs in Kumi, Kyau, Koreng, Khuibiij^ 

 N, Tiuitrkhul, Cha:nphuii/r, and Toun<;-tliii. 



The sp. lib. kcia i^ found ni* a disitiiict njot in the Xapi jrroup khoa, 

 khuon, khun'T, klitt, Afanii)uri gt. kliong, kL«, kang-, and Limbu knora-i'i". 

 Anani bus '^he. Al>oret-ku. 



4. The Chinese mm pan R-t., stin pan K-h., is found in 8inracse for 

 ship kam-panT sam-fihao, tsi phao, Aiiani shop tam han, Jlurraan laong^ pun, 



3. The Chine.-^e chuen is found in Anam th nyen bmf. Brown gives 

 dinp- which must be the Chinese tin^. MTdun": bus ye-asiiig' and Ta- 

 blunff ih-sftno-, whidi are referd*!*' to the Chinese fan, 



Uiis, 1 . The tilendcr formn of ru, ni are only found in the Irawady 

 braufb. The u form wa.s evidently the orig-inaJ in the South, and waa 

 conirannicateil to tJie (hinijretic diafeetfl» the winje form beiagr Ibund in the 

 jfipalj the Hindi tiiid the north Dravimn dialet'ta. 



2. The Tayiiy^ Mishiui rowan^- [=ruan^'] and Ka duftk, appear to 

 preserve an iirchaic form now lost in Tibet, lis presence in the Knmbo- 

 jan group in ono fonn and in tlie Lau in another, accord? with the coni- 

 ponitive antiquity of the Mon-Anatn pflosssariei*. The dJannretic forms 

 don^, dunj^a &c are referable t^n this variety. The Droviriais and Arian 

 gloAsariec* have distinct terms, but none of these are found in the Jlon— 

 Amm. 



5. Arrow. 



1. The Bh. dnh, and Thotrhu ja sucrg:est that the archaic form \v»9 dak. 



The foutheni formn jire similar to the softened Takpa wi-la, (Manyak 

 m-a), Comp. Jili ;Mrt-la, .Siuifpho /w-ln, Toung-thn and Karen // la, ;w-la, 

 Bnrm. m-m, w-yw (fomid alao in f^urunff, 2uunni and Mafrar, and fur- 

 ther contracted in the m-e of Kiraiiti, ph-ee of Uaro ujiJ&is these be me, 

 phee). 



Mijhu Afishmi has the variation lo (lo wat)j and a Pimilar form lu is 

 found in Anjcami the iu, yongpm lu, Cliamph. wir^^lu and applied to the 

 biiw in Tentrsa lu. The Siamese luk (luk ^on,^ — son, A"«-auii u* ifofv) ha* 

 thbi vuuf] with the ^jfutturtd iiual which archaic Tibetan appears to liave 

 had. Kambujan haai y^j-rueu, Man kou, lay, lau. 



The otbrr Jocms of the t4iu fumily have ihe m final, lem Laos, Ahom, 

 lim Khamti. The Kaaia A-nam is related to these. A slender foi-m is 

 also current in Karea M-li, Luug'ke, Kami h, Doing-- nak and Slrunj^ le. 

 £^ak has thf double tmn ^o-li — mtf-la, the second beloii'rinw to the .fiJi- 

 Hurman-Takpa-lll otittn variety, and the former to the older Karen- Ymna, 

 Knmi hn.-* li-rn-i. 



The I'hochu ja is found iu the Khari le-jak bm\ 



