Bennett: Distribution of Hypochceris macula ta. 371 



and two headed), Herb. Brit. Mus. ! ; ' Now nearly or quite 

 extinct,' Baker, Lake Flora, 121, 1885; see Naturalist, Petty, 

 101, 1876 ; W. R. Nash, 1885, J. of Botany, 330, 1885 5 gathered 

 in 1902 by Mr. A. Wilson (sp.) who 'saw many other specimens 

 in inaccessible situations.' 

 Jersey. 



Sea-cliffs, St. Ouen's, July 1872, Piquet sp. ; 'still there in 

 1900,' Lister in litt. 



Other reputed counties : — 

 4. Devon N. 



Lynton, Ravenshaw ; but see Phyt., N.S., 4, 248, 1859; 

 Ilfracombe, Phyt., N.S., 1, 437, 1855-6. 



9. Dorset. 



Not noticed by Mr. Mansell-Pleydell in his Fl. Dorset, ed. 1, 

 1874 ; or ed. 2, 1895. 



15-16. Kent. 



Watson, Outl. Geog. Dist. Brit. PL, 184, 1832; not noticed 

 in the Flora of Kent, p. 218, 1899. 



17. Surrey. 



Watson, I.e. Probably on the authority of Mr. Graves, of 

 Edinburgh, see p. xii., I.e. Not known as a Surrey species. 



33. Gloucester E. 



• In the meadows at Swindon,' Buckman, Bot. Guide to 

 Cheltenham, 50, 1844 ; ' No such plant is in the Gloucester 

 Herbaria,' Coley in litt. As Buckman does not g-ive H. radicata, 

 it was perhaps that species. 



64. York Mid W. 



A maculate Hieracium was so named here. 

 70. Cumberland. 



Keswick, Hutton, Bot. Guide, 158, 1805 ; not noticed by 

 Baker, Lake Flora, 121, 1885 ; or Hodgson, Fl. Cumberland, 

 189, 1898. 

 90. Forfar. 



Dry woods to the East of Forfar, G. Don. No confirmation. 



First record : 'Hieracium montaniim caule aphyllo Hon ramosa 

 flore pallidiore; 'Ray, Cat. PI. Cantab. Nas. App. 1, 6, 1003. 



' On Gogmagog Hills and Newmarket Heath,' Clarke, Firsl 

 Rec. Brit. Fl. Plants, ed. 2, 84, 1900. Reported lor Ireland in 

 ' Contrib. towards a Flora of Tyrone, Londonderry, and 



1902 December i. 



