1838.] 



II in du Inscriplions, 



107 



II. Kalabiiuriya, or Kalaciiiriya Dynasty. 



NAME. 



TITLE. 



Began 



to 

 Reign. 



Saka. 



,Tribliuvana Malla 10?8 



12. Vijala Deva, 

 ■Bijala 



13. Morari Sovi Devai 

 or Vira Vijala, I 

 or Someswara] 

 Deva. iBhuiieka Malla. •• 



14. Sankama Deva,. - lAhawa INIalla. 



10S7 

 1098 



Total Years. 



Ceased | c 

 Rei'rn. 



Saka. 



p I: 



108T 



1098 

 1101 



, These titles 

 ' are 

 I rarely used. 



8| 1 



• III. Yadava Dynasty of Dwara Sahidra, or Koisala 

 Bellalas. 



15. ViraBellala. 



16. Narasimiia •• 



•I 1113 1 1133? 1 ? 1 (1 



•1 • I • 1 • 



IV, 



17. 1, 



18. 2. 



19. 3. 



20. 4. 



21. 5. 

 23. 6. 

 23. 7. 



Ballam Deva. 



Jayatuga Deva, or Jaytuk Dev 



or Jyt Pal Dev. 



Simhana Deva. 



Kandarae Deva, or Kanera Deva 



Maha Deva. 



Ramachaadra. 



Shenkar Deva 



Yadava Dynasty or Devagiri. 

 I 1110 



1115 



1132 



1)70? 



1182 



1193 



1232 



1115 , 



5 





1132 



17 





1170? 



38 





1182 



12 





1193 



11 





1232 



39 





1234 



2 









17 5 



There is only one 

 nscription of his 

 ime, in Saka 11 15. 



The exact year 

 ( of his death, and 



of 



^ sor s aci 

 i has no 

 V. ascertaii 



his succes- 

 3 accession 

 been 

 iued. 



or nearly IS years. 



OF THE CHALUKYAS. 



This is the oldest race of which we find satisfactory mention made 

 in the records of the Dekkan. They seem to have belonged to the 

 great tribe that, under the general name of Rajputs, exercised domi- 

 nion over the whole of Northern and Central India. It seems doabt- 

 ful whether the name Chalukya occurs in the catalogue of the thirty- 

 six royal races, but Colonel Tod has identified them with the Solankis, 

 ti'ho are included in that enumeration, and who for along time ruled 

 over Anhalwara Pattan, in Gujarat. The Solankis, however, were one 

 of the four Agnikulas, whereas the Chalukyas always profess them- 

 selves of lunar origin. And it is remarkable, that in none of the in- 

 scriptions quoted by Colonel Tod, do they style themselves Solankis, 

 but always Chalukyas.* Nor does the former title ever occur in any 

 of the present inscriptions. Indeed, there is every reason for believ- 



* Ann. of Eaju. vol. i,, Appendix IV. and VI. pp. 801—4. 



