126 Second Suppleme?it to the Catalogue of [No. 31 



8. C. cyanopogon T., if distinct from the last. The chief 

 difference is that the black is described as occupying only the 

 chin, whilst in mystacalis it occupies both chin and throat. — 

 The Meliphaga Javanica of Horsfleld is sometimes given as a 

 synonym of C. cochinsinensis, but I believe of late it has been 

 considered identical with Tardus viridis, and both referred to 

 C. Sinner atii . 



No. 73. — It appears that there are 3 species at least of Jora. 

 Our southern species is I. zeylanica, meliceps, Horsf., quite 

 distinct from typhi a of Bengal, which again differs from scapu- 

 laris of Malayana. 



No. 74. — Pycnonotus flavirictus Strickl. It appears that 

 this cannot be the virescens of Temminck, and some time 

 ago I told Mr. Blyth that I intended giving this bird the 

 specific appellation of dumeticolus , a name at once expressive 

 of its habits, and a translation of its Teloogoo name, which 

 signifies Bush Bulbul, but in the mean time Mr. Strickland 

 had met with it in London, and given it the excellent name 

 mentioned above. 



No. 75. Cat. — Mr. Strickland considering this bird distinct 

 from the Turdus indicus of older authors, has named it Criniger 

 (the modern name for 1'richophorus) ictericus. 



No. 76. Cat. — The common Bulbul of the South of India 

 is the muscicapa hcemorrhousa of the old authors, which 

 specific name will accordingly hold good. — It is very distinct 

 from the B. cafer of Bengal, and Mr. Blyth on comparing 

 them first called this species pusittus. — That gentleman has 

 informed me of the present bird being found in Arracan, 

 which shows a truly remarkable geographical distribution. 



No. 78.— Mr. Blyth refers this bird to his new genus 

 Alcippe, vide J. A. S. 



