EXPERIMENTS W ITH A view TO CONTROLLING THE disease. 



97 



Table XX.— Medium Pruning— Ten Cleopatra Trees in two Rows. 



Tree No. 



Row 1 



Row 2 



1 



2 

 3 

 4 

 5 



h 



12 

 3 

 4 



; 5 



Totals for 10 trees 

 Averages for 10 trees 



Yield of— 











Total. 



Per cent. Pitted. 



Good Fruit. 



Pitted Fruit. 







lbs. 



lbs. 



lbs. 





J 15 



2 



117 



1-71 



198 



6 



204 



2'94 



208 



13 



221 



5-88 



192 



9 



201 



4-48 



193 



15 



208 



7-21 



92 



l 





0*54 



210 



9 



219 



4-10 



146 



3 



149 



2-01 



231 



13 



244 



5-33 



98 



9 



107 



8-4L 



1,683 



791 



1,7621 



168*3 



7 '95 





4-51 



Table XXI. — No Pruning— Twelve Cleopatra Trees in two Rows, 



Tree No. 



Row 



16 



91 



Row 



2 1 



Totals for 12 trees 

 Averages for 12 t r&fl 



Vield of — 

 (iood Fruit. Pitted Fruit, 



Total. Per cent. Pitted. 



lbs. 

 216 

 192 

 211 

 192 

 219 

 236 

 219 

 258 

 198 

 216 

 123 



lbs. 



4 



5 



1 



3 

 ■) 



4 

 4 



9 



lbs. 

 220 

 197 

 212 

 195 

 221 

 240 

 2L9 

 262 

 200 

 2164 

 L26 



1 -82 

 2-54 

 0-47 

 I -54 



0- 90 

 [•67 



I -53 



1 - 00 

 0-23 



2- 38 

 0*26 



2,171 



,503 



206 • I 



2 * I 



L-16 



Table XXII. — Summary of Pruning Experiments 



Average Yield. 



(iood Fruit 



Pitted Fruit 



Average per cent, 

 oi Pitted Fruit. 



Hard pruning 

 Medium pruning 

 No pruning 



Medium pruning (single tree pit liable) 

 Uhprunea for LO years (single tree) 



C. 104 09. 



lbs. lbs. 



L76'fl 3 '64 2*02 



168-3 7*9 i -51 



206-1 2-4 1-16 



139 30' 17-75 



396 8 ' 0-50 



