82 
only seen one specimen, belonging to the collection of Mr. Stoke, which had 
been found at Clifton. 
(Mr. W. W. Stoddart here stated that he had met with several specimens 
of this form, and always regarded them as belonging to this species.) 
Z. Enniskilini, M.Edw. The specimen (No. 63), which I have named 
thus, agrees in every thing with the description of this species given in the 
Monograph, except that the septal fossula in the specimen is on the convex 
and not on the concave side. Z. BowerbanH, M. Edw. , Z. patula, Michelin, 
Z. cylindrica, Scouler. Of this species we possess seven well marked 
specimens from our Black Rock, the Mumbles, near Swansea, and from 
Limerick. One of the specimens is remarkable for the great number of septa, 
viz.— about 90 E. subibicina, McC. 2, Genus Amplextjs. A coralloides, 
Sow. All our specimens (from No. 71 to No. 82) are Irish, from Limerick, 
and Killarney. No. 80 may possibly prove a distinct and new species, as 
also No. 83. A. cornu-bovis, Michelin, A. nodulosus, Phill., A. spinosus, 
De Koninck. A. Henslowi, M.Edw. 3, Genus Lophophyllttm. L eruca, 
Mc.O. 4, Genus Cyathophyllum. C. Murchisoni, M.Edw. The speci- 
mens of this species in the collection, six in number, are from our own Rocks, 
and are very typical forms, except Nos. 88 and 89, which were named by 
Mr. Lonsdale, and where I must acknowledge that I can see no difference 
between these and transverse sections of " C. Stutchburyi," except that No. 
88 has perhaps the se])ta somewhat thinner than is usual in that species. 
C. Wrighti, M.Edw. C. Stutchburyi, M.Edw. Of this coral we have 
certainly a magnificent series, from Nos. 90 to 125, and these, with the ex- 
ception of one from Limerick, are all from our own district, viz.— from Long 
Ashton, Clifton, and Knowle Quarry, near Brent ry. The number of septa 
in our specimens I find to vary from 132 to 160. Several specimens (No. 91, 
95, 98, 99,) are typical of "Turbinolia expansa, McC." (McCoy Syn. Carb. 
Foss. of Ireland). C. regium, Phill. The authors of the Monograph must 
surely have made a mistake in saying " C. crenulere, Phill." appears not to 
differ specifically from C. regium, and to be only a variety with smaller 
calices. My opinion is, that C. crenulare, Pill, is a form of "Lonsdaleia 
floriformis,"— a form most abundant in our Rocks, and that it ought to be in- 
cluded amongst the synonymes of this species. Of C . R e gi um, Phill. we again 
have a most beautiful series, as it occurs in our rocks. No. 127 is the original 
of PI. 32, fig. 4, but in my opinion answers more to " C. turbinatum, Goldf." 
than to any other species ; but as the locality of this specimen is not known, 
it ought never to have been figured by our authors. Again, our authors 
state "septa numerous, 120 to 130." Now the number of septa (always a 
