180 
FOREST AND STREAM. 
[Auo. 29, 1895. 
Three New Ideas. 
OeicAGo, HI., Aug. 13.— It is well known that all the erood new ideas 
in trap-shooting; have first had their exposition in the columns of 
Forest and Stream, and all the reforms in trap-shootinK have had 
their birth there. Other papers have been content with servility 
where civility would have been better as a policy. Forest and Stream 
has always believed that ideas at first hand were better than those at 
second hand, and results would seem to indicate the wisdom of this 
belief. When Forest and Stream does not have ideas enough fur- 
nished by its own people it has always been willing to pay for them, 
that being the secret of successful journalism. 
It was Forest and Stream that first invented the copyrighted 
graphic type for scoring a live-bird shoot. Forest and Stream first 
began to tabulate the vast number of trap scores which came in from 
week to week, thus keeping its news up to date and fresh. Forest 
AND Stream was first to attack the evil of dropping for place in ttap- 
shooting, and the only paper to carry on a fight which now is won. 
Forest and Stream has spent more money in getting trap news than 
all the sporting journals of the country together. It has done a lot of 
other things which the modesty of the journal forbids mentioning. It 
is enough to sav that to-day Forest and Stream is the recognized 
journal of the trap. It is therefore very natural that new ideas 
should flow to it, as water runs down hill by the sheer force of 
gravity. 
I am able to-day to ofiFer to Forest and Stream, from the city of 
Chicago, three ideas in trap-shooting which I think are entitled to be 
called new, and one or more of which may prove to have interest and 
merit other than that of mere novelty, although novelty alone is 
enough to commend an idea to a newspaper eager to be up with the 
times. I would be glad to claim the discovery of some of these three 
Ideas, but I cannot do so. They all came up at the recent Du Pont 
tournament here. Two of the ideas belong to Mr, Wells, the able 
artist who did the Forest and Stream sketches at the tournament. 
The third idea really belongs to Mr. S. A. Tucker, of the Parker gun, 
who told me about it some time ago. 
The first of these ideas is what Mr. WeUs prefers to call the "Forest 
AND Stream Clover-Leaf Field," showing the arrangement that can be 
made of three sets of traps at a big tournament. It is too bad this 
idea did not come out before the Du Pont shoot instead of after, for 
this would have been a grand place to try it. 
The second idea is one hit upon by Mr. WeUs at the Duryea- Winston 
pigeon race at Watson's Park, last Monday, Aug. 8. 1 had asked Mr. 
Wells to make me a sketch or so of the shooters in that race, and he 
came out with a sketch showing not only the shooters, but every indi- 
vidual bird they shot at— 200 different sketches in all I This rather 
puts In the shade Forest and Stream's graphic type idea, though of 
course it is not capable of general application. I venture to say that 
there never has been in the history of shooting a pigeon race scored 
as this one shown in our last issue of Forest and Stream. It is a 
curious and novel feature, and one which will please all shooters. 
The sketch of each bird was caught at the instant it took wing. Mr. 
Wells says, "I photographed on ray mind the position of the bird just 
as the first barrel was fired." Nobody told Mr. WeUs to do this. He 
just got the idea. He would be apt to have ideas if he was around a 
sporting paper very long, for he had two ideas in one week. 
While Mr. Wells and I were playing around out at the Du Pont 
shoot, where of course we had nothing to do but pla.y, one of the 
shooters — I think it was Dick Merrill, or maybe it was Chan. Powers 
— remarked that the live-bird shooting took so long that a man only 
got to fire a dozen shots a day. "If we had another set of traps," 
he said, "the management could make a barrel of money out of this 
crowd, for the.v would all be shooting targets." This, as must 
appear on thought, would have really been the ruin of the shoot, for 
a big mixed tournament on any grounds now in t^xist^nce in America 
would be a confused and horrible affair should the number of shoot- 
ers run up as it did here. But while this matter was in discussion 
Mr. Wells said: 
"I'll show you a scheme by which you could run three sets of traps 
without any confusion at all, and you could shoot all live birds or 
part birds and part targets." 
We scoffed at him. but when careful inspection has been given the 
plan he has put in diagram I am not sure that scoflBng will be ap- 
propriate. His scheme is practical. If some shooting park will 
adopt it, it can hold a big shoot any day and make money at it. If 
the next big tournament will take it up it will save money and ac- 
commodate its patrons, no matter how many they are or how much 
they want to shoot, and It will do this smoothly and without as much 
friction as exists in running the best managed shoot. 
The third idea also came up at this shoot. A gentleman present re- 
marked that it was the best dressed crowd of shooters he ever saw. 
Another man said, "Why not? In my opinion the boys have been al- 
most too careless as to how they dressed and how they acted at a 
shoot. Any old sweater or blouse or coat was good enough, and 
everybody seemed to think that at a trap-shoot a man didn't need to 
care how he looked- I have heard ladies, and men too, express their 
surprise at the generally tough look the crowd of trap-shooters at a 
tournament has. They wouldn't know the same crowd after dinner. 
But why not look a little 'slicker' while at the traps? It would all tend 
to raise the standard of the sport." It was then that I recalled a 
talk with Mr. Tucker last June on this same topic. Mr. Tucker told 
me that he was convinced trap-shooting would be helped if it came to 
have a sort of uniform or costume, something as bicycling or other 
sports have. He said that so impressed with this idea was he that he 
once even went to a sporting goods house and put before its 
head the design for a shooting coat, which he thought could be sold 
In large numbers, and which he believed would be a handsome and 
useful garment for any trap-shooter. The manager did not think the 
boys would buy enough of them, and so "turned down" the idea. 
This disgusted Mr. Tucker, who wasn't expecting to make any money 
out of It for himself, so he never took up the matter any further. 
There is probably really more of practical advantage in this 
idea than in either of the others. There is no uniformity and not 
always any neatness in the garb of shooters at the trap. Some of the 
wealthiest of the devotees of the trap go dressed the shabbiest. Even 
the most careless of the careless will admit the usefulness of Mr. 
Tucker's idea. It was his notion that a coat, or a coat and vest, 
would be all that was necessary, the coat to replace the blouse or 
sweater, which seems now to be the nearest to trap uniform. 
He thought the coat could be made of some neutral tint, gray or 
drab or some such shade, of velveteen or uncut corduroy, or some 
soft and easy material. It should be cut with overcoat sleeves, very 
roomy at the shoulder and armpit, and could be designed on lines 
snappy enough to make it a handsome and swell-looking garment. 
The cost would need to be somewhere between to $\0, and one 
would wear a man a lifetime. It would be cool enough to shoot in 
during summer, and roomy enough to wear over woollen in the win- 
ter. It would have pockets to hold the shooter's shells when he went 
to the score. "I want to tell you," said Mr. Tucker, "if you should 
see forty or M'y shooters at a tournament, the most of them dressed 
in that sort of coat, got up by an artistic tailor, you would be sur- 
prised to see the difference there would be from the usual crowd you 
see to day. It would be a better place for a lady to go, and the result 
would be that more ladies would go to shooting tournaments. The 
whole character of the sport would thus be bettered, while it would 
be free from any charge of dudishness. I believe the idea is one that 
some tailor or sporting goods dealer should take up. He would make 
a lot of money at it." 
A number of shooters who were consulted in regard to this idea or 
a trap costume were disposed to think it a useful and a coming thing. 
Mr. Thos. Marshall, very well known on the circuit, said: "If there 
had been a man on these grotmds this week to take measures and 
orders for such a garment, he could have sold 100 of them. If the 
idea was once taken up, all the boys would fall into line. I believe 
it Is a winner." 
I am disposed to think myself that some enterprismg house could 
do a good business with such a garment if it could hit upon a suitable 
cut and fabric. Bicycling, yachting, golf and tennis all have their 
costumes, the making of which constitutes a great industry. As trap- 
shooting becomes more and more developed, it will come in time to 
have a certain type in costume— not anything of a dude type, be sure, 
but something neat, manly, serviceable and useful. 
the CLOYER-IiEAF FIELD. 
Mr. Wells's "Clover-Leaf Field," to use the name happily suggested 
by his friend Dr. Fuller, of Chicago, is shown so well in the diagratu 
that it needs small explanation. It asks for a circular, back-to- back 
arrangement of the traps, instead of one in line. The saving of space 
Is obvious. The saving of time and of confusion would be quite as re- 
markable. The central space is designed to be covered by one canopy 
or large tent, the expense for which would be less than that of 
the row of smaller tents nowadays commonly put up for the com- 
fort of the shooters. The diameter of this central space is about 
165ft. The walls are left down in summer shooting. The shooters 
are all, rounded up in one body and under one inclosure. While 
not shooting they can visit or watch the sport from the bank 
of seats back of the score. The work of the signal hustlers 
is simplified or done away with, for a blackboard of each 
score can announce in the view of all the names of the 
men next wanted. The distance from one score to the 
next around the edge of the circle is about 150ft., far 
enough to prevent confusion in the work of trapping, calling 
and shooting. A short fence separates the diilerent shooting fields. 
The ofiQce is centrally located and in reach of the shooters. Access to 
the grounds is made easy and safe by a wide way between two high 
and tight fences. The direction of the firing is in each case as safe as 
that now practiced. Along the entrance way, or the stem of the 
Clover Leaf, can be placed the individual tents and headquarters. In 
short, this scheme, while useful in its entirety for a very large shoot 
or for a large permanent park, has many features to commend it for 
use at a big tournament. It saves room and expense, and condenses 
the whole affair into a nutshell of simplicity and convenience. The 
idea could be adopted in part in the holding of smaller shoots. The 
Clover-Leaf Field is a great saver of space. Watson's Park at Chi 
"forest and stream" CLOVER-LEAJ'. 
cago could hold three sets of traps thus arranged as well as it now 
does two sets. 
At first thought it would seem ridiculous to advance a scheme ap- 
parently so big and circus-like to hold a trap shoot. But trap shoots 
have grown bigger and bigger, Thpy have cost more and more 
money. They have been managed with greater and greater excel- 
lence of business sagacity and business system. The idea does not 
imply a greater expense. It only implies a greater systematizing of 
the handling of a great shoot. The time may come when it will be 
seriously considered, not as a Jumbo freak, but as a large aud admir- 
able idea, well worked out. E. Hough. 
1206 BovcB Building, Chicago. 
Jack Parker's Tournament. 
Buffalo, N. Y., Aug. 2i.— Editor Forest and Stream: I was sorry 
to read In your report of the Detroit tournament that the Rose sys- 
tem was abandoned after the first day. Like many others, I am in 
favor of adopting this system at all tournaments, because I look upon 
it as the only fair and square way of dividing purses. It was quite a 
shock to me, then, to find that it was shelved after only a short trial. 
Knowing the system to be all right, 1 hunted around for some good 
reason for its being put aside in favor of the other method of dividing 
purses, a method which you have shown to be full of injustice. For 
the life of me I can find no reason. 
The figures quoted are scarcely correct, if the scores in yoiu- tables 
are correct. Your report says: "Trimble shot 92 per cent, the first 
day and lost S4.50; 90 percent, the second day and won $3; 93 per cent, 
the third day and lost $4." Looking at Trimble's scores I find that the 
percentage he made on the first day was 91.8, practically 9i per cent., 
as your report has it. On the second day his percentage was 88.1 for 
all events, but 93 3 for all events except the one at 31yds. rise, use of 
both barrels. On the ttiird day his percentage was just 91, instead of 
93. There being evidently something wrong with the figures on the 
percentages, I wanted to try and work out the purses under the Rose 
system and then compare them with the system gejieraily used at 
present. Itwasnota hard matter to get one of Parker's programmes ; 
there were plenty in the city. But it was a hard matter to work out 
all the purses, but it began to be quite interesting before I finished. 
Taking the first day's scores, I mase it out that Trimble lost $3 09 
under the Rose system, but would have lost $3.94 under the present 
system. (In explanation I may say that I have taken into strict 
account all the pennies.) On the last day, shooting in only five events, 
I find that under the present system he cleared 83.04, while under the 
Rose system he would only have been 58 cents auead. The difference 
here is due to his 24 out of 25 in the last event, which paid him $11,47 
under the present system, but only $8,60 under the Rose system. 
Heikes's figures for the same two days are quite instructive. On 
first day, under the Rose system, he won 33 cents and % gold watch I 
Under the present system, on that day he would have been a watch in, 
but $3.48 out. On the last day he was $1.93 ahead under the present 
system, but under the Rose system he would have won $7.93. It must 
be remembered that Heikes on the last day dropped only 6 targets out 
of 205 shot at, averaging a traction over 97 per cent. 
Compare the two systems then : On the last day Heikes breaks over 
97 per cent, out of his 205 targets, and under the present system— the 
one used at Detroit that day— he wins $1.9!i; Trimble on the same day 
loses 10 targets out of 105 and wins $3.01, But it is manifestly unfair 
to judge any system by the results of one or two shooters. One 
ought properly to take into consideration the results attained by all, 
I suppose there are other statistical fiends among your readers be- 
sides myself, and probably they may be interested if you give some of 
the following figures showing how the two systems paid at Detroit: 
The programme says that all purses were divided into five moneys, 
with 8, 5, 3, 2 and 1 as the points in the Rose system, and I have fig- 
ured all purses that way unless it was stated in the programme to the 
contrary. Dividing purses under the present system, I have made the 
moneys 30, 25, 20, 15 and 10 per cent. 
First day: In event No. 1 the Rose system, as compared with the 
old system, paid to those in first money $3.28 as against $3.65; second 
money, $3.05 as against $1.01; third money, $1.23 as against $3 65; 
fourth money, 82 cents as against $1.82; fifth money, 41 cents as against 
52 cents. Under the present system third money would have paid as 
much as first, while third and fourth would both nave been better than 
second money. 
In event No. 2 there were twelve straight scores; six men in for 
second money, three in for third money, seven in for fourth money, 
and only two in tor fifth money. The comparison of the two systems 
shows tnat the Rose system paid (for $i entrance) £3.16 for first money 
as against $1.05 under the present system; second money, $1,35 as 
■against $1 75; third money, 81 cents as against $3.80; fourth money, 54 
cents as against 90 cents, and fifth money, 27 cents as against $3,10. 
It will be seen that the 19s, 188 and 16s were all better than straight 
scores. 
Event No, 3, a 25-target event, shows the justice (?) of dividing 
purses on the old percentage plan. There were six straight scores, 
five scores of 24, four of 23, five of 22, and two of 21; twenty-two men 
out of twenty-seven entries drawing money. The entrance fee was 
$3. Under the old system each man who had scored 25, 24, 23 or 21 
would have drawn exactly the same amount, $3.03; the 328 would 
have drawn down $1.83 each. Under the Rose system straights paid 
$4.96; 248, $3,10; 23^, $1.86; 22s, $1,24, and 31s, 62 cents. The above is 
a good example of how the Rose system works as against the old 
system. 
In No. 4 under the present system straights paid $1.33, while the 
12s and the solitary 11 received $3 65 and $3.54 respectively. Under 
the Rose system the same places would have paid $3.08 as against 52 
cents and 26 cents respectively. 
I could give plenty of other proofs of the equitable distribution of 
purses under the Rose System, but I know your space is valuable. I 
should, however, like to give one more example: the sixth event on 
the last day, 25 targets, $5 entrance, 18 entries, four moneys, 40, 30, 
20 and 10 per cent. Ftinning, with 25 alone, took, according to my 
figures, $30.60; the two 24s drew down $11.47; the five 23s received 
$3,06 and the five 23s took $1 52 each. Had the purse been divided 
into five moneys and divided under the Rose System the same parties 
would have received respectively $13.60, $8.50, $5,10 and $3.40, while 
the two 31s would have received $1,70 each. I leave it to any of your 
readers to say which is the fairest system. 
It I may be allowed a few more words in conclusion, I would like to 
point out that the trouble with the cracker jacks at Detroit was that 
tbe handicap was a little too stiff for them when the capabilities of 
some of the other shooters are taken into consideration. They did not 
have it all their own way, and it looks to me as it they don't like any- 
thing that does not give them everything tney ask. 
For my part I vote for the Rose system first, last and all the time. 
48QRS, 
Emerald Gun Club of New York. 
Nbw York, Aug. 18.— The Emerald Gun Club held its regular month- 
ly ahoot this afternoon at Dexter Park, L. I. The attendancse was 
good, 29 members putting in an appearance. Of the above number 
three made clean scores of 10 birds: E. Dudley, R. Phister and Qus 
Qreiff. Nine others landed' with scores of 9 each. The scores, with 
the handicaps of yards and points, were: 
Class A, 29yd8., 7 points: Richard Phister 10, Qus E. Greifl! 10, L. H. 
Schortemeier 9, Edward J. Clark 9. Class A, 28yds., 7 points: Dr. 
George V. Hudson 6, Thomas Short 8, Class A. 28yds.. 6^ points: E. 
Dudley 10, Charles Stuetssle 5, Gus Nowak 9, Harry P, Fessenden 9, 
Edward A, Vroome 6, John H. Moore 8, George E. Loeble 9, Prank W, 
Place 9, William Sands 7. Class A. 28yds., 6 points: Philip Butz 5, 
Dr, Klein 9, Richard Began 8, Joseph Banzer 4. Class A, 28yds., 5J^ 
points: Bernard Amend 8, Henry Thiele 9, Max Adams 9. Class A, 
28yd8., 5 points: .Tohn Woelfel 8. Class B, 26yds., 5% points: Thomas 
F, Cody 5, Class B, 25yds,, 6 points: Nicholas Maesel 8. Class B, 
S5yds,, 5 points: Dr. Richter 6, Emll Weiss 5, G. K. Breit 5, G. B. Hfl- 
lera 7. 
Calumet Heights Gun Club, of Chicago. 
Chicago, III,, Aug 15,— The regular shoot of the Calumet Heights 
Gun Club took place this afternoon. The trophy contest was the 
main event of the programme. 8. M. Booth won in Class A, P. D. 
Norcom in Class B, and C, C. ChambBrlain in Class C. There was a 
strong wind blowing in the face of the shooters, the wind also raising 
the targets, making their flight uncertain. Twenty-nine shooters 
were in attendance during the afternoon, about 1,000 targets being 
thrown. Scores in the trophy contest were: 
S M Booth ". . . . 1111111011111110001111111-21 
Patty OlllinillllOlllllOlOllll-20 
S Young 1110010111010011111110010—16 
OlfiSS B 
P D Norcom '. . . .0111101101011011111011111—19 
S H Greeley 0001011100111011000100011—18 
J S Houston 0110111001011001101111110—16 
OIass C 
J Morgan '. . , .1100000001011010111010100 -11 
C C Chamberlain .... . , 1011110111101110011101011—18 
Dr Kellogg 1000000101100100011110000— 9 
Sweepstakes resulted as follows: 
Events: 1 8 3 * 5 0 Events: 12 3 4 5 6 
Targets: 
15 10 10 10 10 SO 
Booth 13 4 7 .. 5 .. 
Patterson 13 5 7 7 10 .. 
Young 12 4 3 .. 8 .. 
Norcom 12 4 6 6 4 24 
Targets: 
Greeley 9 
Houston ,. 10 
Morgan 4 
Chamberlain.... 10 
15 10 10 10 10 SO 
5 2 10 3 . . 
6 6 7 3 24 
... 4 4.. 
Nos. 1 and 6 were at unknown angles; No 2, 5 pairs, unknown traps 
and angles; No 3, 5 pairs, snipe shooting, unknown traps and angles; 
No. 4, same as No. 3; No. 5, unknown traps and angles. 
In New Jersey. 
ENDEAVOR GUN CLUB, 
Aug. Jfi.— The following sweeps were shot to-day on the grounds at 
Marion, this being the occasion of the third Dunellen-Endeavor team 
race, the score of which was given in our issue of Aug, 22. All events 
were at unknown angles, with the exception of No, 5, which was at 
known traps and angles. The best shooting was done by Louis 
Schortemeier, who shot consistently well during the afternoon. 
Scores: 
Events: 
Targets 
Apgar..., 
Lindzey ... 813 
Wells 10 10 
7 11 
12345678 
10 15 10 15 10 20 to 15 
9 11 8 15 
Adams 
Edwards . . 
Lemuel 
G Piercy... 
C von Len- 
gerke.... 6 10 
Cramer..,. 7 11 
Ingram,,.. 5 9 
James 4 6 
Fessenden, 8 12 
Mulvaney , 3 4 
L Piercy... 6 .. 
Baron,,.. . 8 18 
8 18 
8 9 
9 10 
9 12 10 13 
9 9 8 13 
6 9 9 10 
9 18 12 
8 16 14 
7 17 , . 
6 17 .. 
7 18 9 
7 12 11 
7 13 
Events: 
Targets: 
Zust 9 9 
W Fletcher 5 10 
Collins 9 
Schorty 14 
NE Money ..11 6 11 
HE Money . . 10 10 10 
ARStrader .,11 7 11 
GUes,,.., , 5 5 
Erhardt 8 7 
12345678 
10 15 10 15 10 SO 15 IS 
8 10 7 14 9 . . 
8 7 8 
8 13 10 i? ih 14 
9 14 9 18 16 IS 
6 
3 Dr Fletcher 
8 10 
9 
8 
8 15 
4 .. 
5 .. 
7 18 
8 .. 
2 14 
9 11 
12 
7 
12 
8 12 
8 17 
Runyon 8 
Lucky 5 
Sisty . .. ..10 
Osborne... ., ,. 5 6 5 .. 
Smith , 7 15 
10 
Haverhill Gun Club. 
Haverhill, Mass , Aug 15.— The team race between teams from the 
Bradford Gun Club and the Haverhill Gun Club took place to-day on 
the grounds of the latter club The teams were of six men each, and 
each man shot at 30 targets, 15 at known angles and 15 at unknown 
angles. The result was an easy win for the home team, who scored 
114 to their opponents' 57. Several sweeps were also shot, the results 
in these events being as below: 
Events: 123456789 10 
Targets: 
Hilllard 7 .. 
Wright iv...-.,.*.. .r..,. 7 ,. 
Stevens. . , • • 3 . . 
Leighton . , 5 5 
Hines 5 5 
Orne , > 6 •■ 
Webster. I. .,..rt..v:,<,i 4 
DS Short ,. .. 6 
Welcti...,, 5 
Eaton , 
10 10 10 10 10 so 10 10 
.. 10 
6 13 
7 II 
,, 11 
10 10 
9 .. 
.. 5 
.. 5 
.. 8 
3 
9 
11 
12 
1 
Miner 53 
Alexander 3 
EP Blake 6 .. 3 9 
KB Short .,. 3 .. 4 .. .. 
Putnam..... 3 .. 
F J Blake 4 .. 4 ., 
George...... .. .. 7 
Brooks , 0 
Scribner 5 
Miller 7 
4 .. 
3 3 
Cook County Trap-Shooters' lioague. 
Chicago, lU., Aug. 15.— The fifth contest of the Cook County Trap- 
Shooters' League took place to-day on the grounds of the Garden 
City Gun Club. The attendance was the largest on record in the his- 
tory of the league. The result in the team race was as follows: 
Eureka Gun Ulub— Class A.— Patterson 23, Wright 19, A. W. Adams 
19, F. Stannnrd 31, Steck 19, Goodrich 15—115. 
Eureka Gun Club— Class B.— Carson 15, H, Carson 21, Stannard 19, 
Glover 19, Shepard 31, Whitman 16—111. 
Garfield Gun Club— Class A.— Hicks 33, Lengerke 17, Piltz 16, Bowers 
31, F. Adams 22-98. 
Garfield Gun Club— Class B.— Dr. Shaw 23, Richard 19, Palmer 18 
Kuss 24, Pehrman 30, Copp 31—125. 
Douglas Gun Club, Class B: Carter 33, Murphy 13, Barto 23, John- 
son 17, Eich 22, Hart 30—115. 
Cicero Gun Club, Class B: Lawler 13, Lawrie 31, Cheeseman 11, 
Cooper 17, W. Cheeseman 15, Knoot 17—94. 
Calumet Heights Gun Club, Class B: Lanphere 83, Wescott 33, 
Booth 31, oung 15, Hodson 18, Ferguson 16—115. 
Calumet Heights Gun Club, Class C: Greely 18, Houston 16, Mar- 
corn 13, Metcalf 13, Black 17, Marshall 19—98. 
Garden City Gun Club, Class B: Rnbel 24, Kemp 82, Rexford 19, 
Cutler 18, Amberg 19, Antoine 31—133. 
Garden City Gun Club, Class C: Levy 17, Halligan 13, Kimball 13, 
Ludlow 13, Biasell 16, Wilcox 33—94. 
Lynchburg Gun Club. 
LvNCHBDRQ, Va., Aug. 20.— The regular weekly shoot of the Lynch- 
burg Gun Club was held to-day. Event No, 4 was the contest for the 
Silverthorn badge; Mr. Terry won the badge with 33 out of 35, Moor- 
man being right after him with 82, 
Events: 1 2 3 4 5 6 
Targets: 20 20 10 Sg SO 6 
Nelson 18 17 7 18 19 5 
Terry 14 16 9 33 18 5 
Moorman 16 10 6 33 17 3 
Cleland 13 11 4 7 13 3 
Events: 12 3 4 6 6 
Targets: $0 SO 10 Z5 m 5 
Miller.. 14 16 7 16 16 4 
Stearns 10 13 4 13 12 8 
Clark. 14 3 
F. M. D. 
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS- 
W. L. M.— For hunting license in Quebec apply to the Chief Game 
Commissioner, Quebec, Canada. '. 
F. E. L., Newark, N. J.— A sells to B a well-bred mare in foal. i. 
bred the mare to a well-bred stallion. Afte iB bought the mare she 
has her colt and B raises it. Which is the breeder? Ans.— A, 
