314 A COMMENTARY ON THE SECOND BOOK 
tivated in Macassar, and perhaps of the same genus with 
the Bilalangh. 
Kb Ule s. Caju Ular^ p. 89. 
This is evidently a species of the same genus with the 
Cassia Fistula silvestris^ that is, having round each seed a 
corky arillus. 
CAP. XXXII. 
Tamarindus, p. 90, t. 23. 
We have here an excellent account of this well-known 
tree. Of this^ the Tamarindus Americanus, siliqua fere 
orhiculata monosperma (Phyt. t. 64, f. 4, a), and the Ta- 
marindus Bisnagaricics^ siliqua productiore dispermos^ se- 
minibus veluti istkmo interceptis of Plukenet {ibid, b), seem 
to be mere accidental variations. 
Cabandje s. Carandjang, p. 93. 
Rumphius notices, that this had been confounded by 
Bontius with the Carandasoi Garzia, and badly described, 
in having its leaves compared to those of the Tamarind (bi- 
pinnata), while, in fact, they are like those of the Lingoa 
(pinnata). Its legumen contains only one seed, surrounded 
by a quantity of pulp agreeable to eat. Plukenet (Mant. 
177), has fallen into the same error with Bontius, in con- 
founding this plant with that of Garzia ; but the quotations 
from C. Bauhin and Imperatus probably belong to the 
Carandje of the Malays here noticed. This is a fruit of 
which I know nothing ; nor do I find it mentioned in any 
modern work. It perhaps has some affinity with the Cyno- 
morium, although its leaves being pinnated implies a differ- 
ent habit, more like the Connarus. 
