LIST OF PUBLICATIONS. 
233 
other than new species. The accustomed indications of novelty are but 
seldom given,, though, from the unusual length and detail of some descrip- 
tions, there can be no doubt that certain species not absolutely referred to 
as new are really intended to be published as such. Several others, 
and some genera mentioned, may also he intended to be published as new. 
PiccioLi, Ferdinando. Catalogo sinonimico e topografico del 
Coleotteri della Toscana. Bull. Ent. Ital. iv. pp. 259-272- 
In this fourth year of its continuation, this list (compiled with the help of 
Bargagli) reaches to the end of the Carahidce. 
Keiche, L. Catalogue des Coleopteres de L^Algerie et contrees 
voisines, avec description d^especes nouvelles : pp. 44. Ex- 
tracted from Mem. Soc. L. Norm. (2) xv. (bearing date 
1869) : published in 1872. 
This part comprises from the Cicindelidce to the Staphylinidce inclusively. 
Several species, which must of course be considered as dating frQjn 1872, are 
described (by Reiche, Pandelle, and Fauvel) in the notes ; and some 
changes of nomenclature are proposed ; for comments on which, and a 
general review of the work, see C. H. x. p. 230, and Nouv. et Faits, p. cxxxiii 
(July, 1872). The author acknowledges the assistance of MM. Lallemant 
and Fauvel ; the portion relating to the Brachelytra being apparently entirely 
attributable to the latter. 
Seidlitz, Georg. Fauna Baltica. Die Kafer (Coleoptera) der 
Ostseeprovinzen Russlands, Dorpat : 1872, 8vo : Liefe- 
rung 1, table of families, pp. 1-24 (table of genera), pp. 1- 
128 ; Lief. ii. p. i-xx (introductory chapter on external 
anatomy, collecting, &c.), pp. 25^8 (table of genera), 
pp. 129-208, one plate. 
Reviewed by v. Harold in C. H. x., by Kiesenwetter & Kraatz, B. E. Z. 
xvi. pp. 239 & 240, and by J. Faust, Hor. Ent. Ross, viii.. Rev. Bibl. p. x. 
The work is on the same dichotomous scheme as Redtenbaclier's well- 
known 'Fauna Austriaca,' rendered more difficult to follow by the copious 
use of abbreviations and symbols. Species likely to occur in the district 
are described, in different type. The following is the list (in order) 
of families employed and now discussed by the author : — (Leif. i.) Cara- 
bicidse [_sic], Dytiscidae, Gyrinidae, Palpicornia, Heteroceridae, Parnidae, 
Georyssidai, Lucanidae, Scarabaeidas, Biiprestidae, Eucnemidae, ElateridaB, 
Dermestidae, Byrrhidae, (Lief, ii.) Histeridse, Micropeplidse, Nitidulid£e, 
Peltidae, Byturidae, Mycetophagidae, Phalacridae, Rhysodidae, Cucujidae (in- 
cluding Hypocoprm and Lyctus), Colydiidae (including Monotonia, Lathridius^ 
Corticaria, Symbiotes, Mycetcea, Alexia, Leiestes, Myrmecoxenus, and Mur- 
midius, from which Ceuthocerus advena is supposed to be distinct, &c.), 
Oryptophagidae (including Aspidophorus, Eriyis, and Sphindus), Oissidae, 
Tolmatophilidae (consisting of Diphyllus, Diploccelus, Psammoechus, and 
Telmatophihis), Erotylidae, Endomychidae, Coccinellidae, Oorylophidae, Tri- 
chopterygidae, Scaphidiidae, Sphaeriidae, Clambidae, Anisotomidae. From the 
table, it is evident that the work will be continued thus : — Silphidae, Scyd- 
maenidae, Paussidae, Pselaphidae, Staphylinidae, Malacodermata, and Tere- 
