THE HERJBAIIIUM AMBOINENSE. 
329 
It must be observed, that Wilidenow considers the 
Rademachia integra of Thunberg as the same with the 
Tsjaca n tar am of Rheede, which, as I have said, is the 
Saccus arhoreus major of Rumphius ; while the Compilers 
of the Encyclopedie (iii. 210) consider it as the same with 
the Saccus arhoreus minor ^ and as being the original Arto- 
carpus integrifolia of the younger Linnaeus. 
Saccus arboreus minor alterus, p. 108. 
Saccus arboreus minor tertius, p. 108. 
From the short notices given of these plants in the text, 
it is impossible to say whether or not they should be con- 
sidered as varieties, or as species. In plants, however, so 
little cultivated as these would seem to be, the latter opinion 
is the most probable. * 
Angelyquen vel Caju Bandaa, p. 109. 
Burman in his observation wonders that Rumphius 
should have confounded his Saccus arhoreus mmor with 
the Ansieli of the Hortus Malabaricus (iii. t. S2) ; but he 
seems to have read no more of Rumphius than the title of 
the chapter, for the latter nowhere says any such thing. 
Towards the end of the chapter, after having described 
three kinds of the Saccus arhoreus minor, he proceeds to 
state, that, in Malabar, there is still another kind of Saccus 
arhoreus, with a small fruit, which is there called Angely- 
quen ; and afterwards, in an appendix, he adds, that the 
same kind is found in Java, where it is called Caju Bandaa, 
and that it is the same with the Ansieli of the Hortus Ma- 
labaricus. Now, this is a very distinct species, which the 
Compilers of the Encyclopedie (iii. 210) called Artocarpus 
hirsuta. Wilidenow chose (Sp. PI. iv. 189) to call this 
plant Artocarpus pubescens, quoting the Encyclopedie with 
