boi APPENDIX ON THE ROMAN-BRITISH 
Claudius Gotliicus (emperor a.d. 268—270) 3,787 ^ 
Quintillus (brother of Claudius, emperor a.d. 27<') 691 
Aurelian (emperor a.d, 270—275) 164 
Severina (wife of Aurelian) 14 
Tacitus (emperor a.d. 275, 270) 206 
Florian (brother of Tacitus, emperor a.d. 276) 22 
Probus (emperor a.d. 276—282) 430 
Carus (emperor a.d. 282, 283) 12 
Carinus (Cpesar a.d. 282 ; emperor 283—285) 24 
Numerian (brother and colleague of Carinus) 14 
Magnia Urbica (wife of Carinus) 2 
Diocletian (emperor A.D. 285 — 305) . , 76 
Maximiau (colleague of Diocletian, a.d. 286 — 305) 53 
Constantius Chlorus (Ccesar a.d. 292 ; became emperor a.d. 305) , 1 
Carausius (emperor iu Britain a.d. 286 — 294) 502 
Allectus (ditto, a.D- 294—296) 82 
Total 24,985 
Among the coins which have been examined there are 110 
(and doubtless there are many more among the rest) which 
must have come from the m.int in an imperfect state, some 
of them having either no heads or no reverses; some having 
a reverse on both sides ; some twice struck, either with the 
head of the same prince, or with the head of one prince on 
a coin previously bearing tliat of another. A large number 
(4,767 on the whole, most of them, apparently, of the com- 
moner sorts) have been laid aside, as too much defaced to 
be capable of any satisfactory identification. In Plate IX., 
two specimens of the coins of Carausius, one of Tacitus, and 
one of Diocletian, are engraved. 
With respect to the condition of these coins, it is worth 
observation that those of Valerian, Gallienus, Salonina, Claudius, 
Yictorinus, the two Tetrici, and Carausius, are generally the 
most worn and defaced — a fact which as to those of Carausius 
(almost the latest in the whole series) seems remarkable. All 
the imperial coins of later date than Aurelian (as also those of 
Severina, and many of Aurelian himself), and all the coins of 
Allectus, are comparatively unworn and in fine condition, 
except when (as has happened in a few cases) they have 
sustained accidental damage, from excessive oxidation or 
adhesion while underground, or in the processes of separation 
^ Some coins of Quintillus may be among the uncleaned coins of Claudius. 
