AxTQ. 7. 1897.] 
The Indian Wolf Slioot. 
< In our last iasue we gave the story of the Indian Wolf shoot at 
Clear Lake, la., July 20-'23, from the pen of ourcorre.'spoDdent, Hawk- 
eye. OwiDgto our distance from the scene of this great pow-wow, 
and the exigencies of the Great White Father's mail service, we were 
Bomewhat lucky to have been able to do even a? much as that. 
We showed how Buffalo Hump (Prank Parmelee) landed first aver- 
age for the shoot with an average of 90.5 for 600 targets shot at. 
Next to him came Bald Eagle and Heap Talk, two mighty chieftains, 
the possessors of many scalps, with an average of 83 6 each. (For 
purposes of identification by those who know them not imder the 
above appellations, we would state that the chiefs referred to are 
respectively, Rolla O. Heikes and Fred Gilbert). Chris. Gottlieb, a 
white man, and a very white man, too, who hails from Mliottstown, 
better known perhaps as Kansas City, Mo., won fourth honors with a 
general average of 88.1 Behind him, in order of merit, came Wipe- 
stick (Chan Powers), Moonfaee (Charlie Grimm), Long Talk (Tom 
Marshall, the hero of this year's Grand American Handicap), Dago 
Chief (Charlie Budd), No Talk (Geo. Loomis), Eddie Bingham and 
Kibby. It will thus be seen that out of the eleven who shot through 
tlie entire programme, only three were not members of the famous 
baud of Indians who fathered this shoot. 
We propose now to review the work of the shooters in detail, 
giving each day's scores as made, placing the shooters In order of 
merit. 
First Day, July 20. 
The programme to-day, as on each of the three target days, con- 
sisted of ten 80-target events, entrance $2.60, targets- included, 815 
added to each purse, five moneys. 
There must have been something strange in the flight of the tar- 
gets or in the background, for at the start things were very much 
mixed up. Gilson was high in No. 1 with 18, four 17s dividing second 
money With five moneys, this let in the 148, and made Tom Mar- 
shall and Corey glad. In No. 8 there were two straights, but in Noa. 
3 and 4, 19 was high. In the matter of straights, Heikes was high 
with 3, Gottlieb had a, and so had Parmelee, who bunched his in Nos. 
6 and 7. Gilbert, Grim and Valentine each made a straight. 
■ Parmelee was high to-day with 183 out of 200, an average of 91.5. 
He shot a very steady gait, seldom making anything like a break. 
Heikes was second with 181, an average of 90.5; he began rather badly 
with 17 and 16 in Nos. 1 and 2, respectively. His scores for the day 
show np rather curiously for such a steady and reliable shot; his last 
six scores were 17,20,17,29,17, 30! Gottlieb, Powers and Grimm, 
finished In order named. 
Events: 
F S Parmelee... 
R O Heikes 
Fred Gilbert.,,. 
Chris Gottlieb.. 
C M Powers. , ... 
C M Grimm. . , . , 
Valentine 
C W Budd 
Eddie Bingham. 
T A MarshaU... 
Kibby 
Henshaw 
G W Loomis.... 
Herman , 
S A Smith , 
Plummer... 
Cook.. 
£ A Leach 
Howard 
Ferguson, 
Mortenson , 
Covey 
Patch 
Baldwin 
J G Smith 
Gilson 
Brucker , 
Laughlin 
Linderman..,.,. 
G Agard 
W H Milner 
Lineberger 
Latshaw ........ 
J H Sams 
Entries: 
12346678 9 10 Shot at. Broke. Ave. 
17 18 
, 17 16 
16 20 
15 16 
17 19 
15 20 
16 17 
16 18 
15 17 
14 13 
12 12 
11 16 
12 18 
16 13 
17 15 
10 14 
12 .. 
13 18 
13 18 
15 19 
14 14 
16 13 
19 18 
19 18 
17 19 
16 19 
17 17 
17 18 
13 14 
12 15 
12 18 
17 15 
16 15 
9 17 
12 17 
14 13 
16 14 
11 17 
15 12 
18 17 
18 16 
.. 16 
17 l.^ 
.. 12 
16 16 
15 16 ,, .. 
18 18 . . 15 
. . 12 17 . . 
8 ., .. n 
is !! i4 
i2 13 ! ! io 
19 30 20 
17 20 17 
16 18 16 
20 17 17 
15 19 15 
18 17 16 
16 18 20 
16 19 16 
15 17 17 
17 18 14 
15 18 18 
15 14 16 
17 14 16 
14 16 17 
10 13 12 
15 15 18 
13 16 11 
4 14 12 
19 14 17 
18 18 17 
17 .. .. 
13 15 .. 
11 .. .. 
. . 12 18 
10 12 14 
18 .. .. 
15 12 . . 
11 10 
- ■ • • * 
15 .. 
17 17 18 
20 17 SO 
18 18 17 
17 80 16 
18 17 17 
19 15 14 
19 18 16 
15 19 18 
17 15 14 
16 17 19 
16 17 16 
12 17 18 
16 13 10 
13 14 15 
17 14 16 
13 18 12 
14 17 16 
16 .. ,. 
is is 14 
.. 15 .. 
13 .. .. 
12 14 13 
18 15 16 
13 14 13 
14 
16 
200 
183 
91.5 
200 
181 
90.5 
200 
175 
87.5 
200 
173 
86.5 
200 
171 
85.5 
200 
169 
84.5 
200 
167 
83.5 
200 
164 
82 
200 
157 
78.5 
200 
157 
78.5 
300 
155 
77.5 
200 
155 
77.5 
200 
145 
72.5 
200 
145 
72.5 
200 
144 
72 
200 
138 
69 
.18J 
126 
70 
160 
118 
70 
140 
115 
82,1 
140 
112 
80 
120 
96 
80 
120 
81 
67.5 
100 
71 
71 
100 
69 
69 
100 
67 
67 
80 
69 
86.2 
80 
56 
70 
80 
35 
43.7 
60 
49 
81.6 
60 
43 
70 
60 
40 
66.6 
60 
35 
58.3 
20 
16 
SO 
20 
14 
70 
27 25 23 26 28 85 28 23 22 22 Average entry, 34.4 
Second Day, July 21. 
If there was something curious about the scores of the first day, 
what must be said of those of to-day ? Onl.v four straights were made ; 
Gilbert and Parmelee each made one in No. 5, and Gottlieb and 
Loomis each scored a straight in No. 7. In No. 3, 18 was high, but in 
all the rest of the events first money went to the 19s. In Nos. 1, 3, 4, 
6, 8 and 9, there were only two 19s for first money; but in No. 10, with 
only 35 entries, eight 19s and three 18s showed up for first and second 
moneys. 
Fred Gilbert landed in first place to-day. with just 90 per cent, for 
his SOO targets. He began rather weakly with 15 in No. 1, and 16 in 
No. 3, but picked up and went to the front. Parmelee was second on 
the list with 88 per cent., or 24 targets lost out of 200 shot at. His 
scores show three 15s, in Nos. 1, 6 and 7, a total of only 45 breaks 
out of 60 shot at. In the other seven events he broke 131 out of 140! 
Gottlieb, who also started off poorly with a 16 and 15 in Nos. 1 and 2, 
respectively, was third for the day, two break.s ahead of Heikes, who 
made a 19, six 18s, and a 17, 15 and 14. In Nos. 7, 8 and 9 he lost just 
16 targets; at the end of No. 6 he was high man for the day, with 11 
losses out of IviO shot at. Altogether, the scores to-day, without any 
actual knowledge of the circumstances under which they were made, 
such as wind, Ught,;etc., are remarkably low for the quality of the 
shooters engaged in cracking the targets. 
Events: 
F Gilbert 
F S Parmelee 
C Gottlieb. 
R O Heikes 
G W Loomis 
T A Marshall ....... 
0 M Grimm ..i..,,., 
C M Powers..,, 
Sanford..,, 
C W Budd. 
Hughes 
B Bingham . , 
E A Leach... 
Valentine.,.. 
Brady 
Kibby 
Watson 
Henshaw..... 
S A Smith. . . 
Mahoney 
Patch 
Herman 
Linderman... 
Corey 
Peitit 
Qlasier 
Plumiher, 
Laughlin 
Gilson 
Milner....... 
Cook 
Mortenson , . . 
Robinson . . . . , 
Agard 
Konvalinski., 
Drake 
Entries: 
1»345678910 Shot at. Broke. Av. 
15 19 16 
15 18 18 
16 15 18 
19 18 18 
13 15 17 
16 15 16 
11 14 15 
14 14 16 
17 19 12 
13 15 14 
12 17 18 
9 16 16 
13 14 11 
16 15 17 
12 14 10 
14 13 14 
6 9 9 
13 12 14 
15 10 13 
12 10 13 
15 17 .. 
.. 13 13 
9 16 14 
.. .. 13 
18 12 . . 
12 7 .. 
13 9 .. 
5 8.. 
14 14 . . 
15 12 .. 
18 20 19 
18 20 16 
19 18 16 
18 18 18 
17 19 16 
17 13 18 
18 18 16 
18 16 15 
19 15 15 
16 16 18 
17 13 19 
16 18 16 
17 17 16 
11 12 16 
17 14 18 
Ih 14 13 
4 13 10 
13 14 14 
14 9 ,. 
14 13 
18 17 19 
15 19 19 
20 IS 17 
15 17 14 
20 17 17 
18 18 15 
19 19 17 
18 18 14 
14 16 17 
14 16 18 
15 15 12 
12 17 16 
13 15 18 
14 17 14 
14 16 13 
11 11 13 
11 11 6 
.. 15 16 
.. 10 12 
19 
19 
18 
18 
19 
19 
17 
19 
16 
18 
17 
17 
19 
19 
16 
14 
15 
19 
13 
16 
12 
IS 
14 
11 
14 9 
19 !! 
9 
ii 
17 
10 
13 
6 
200 
180 
90 
200 
176 
88 
200 
175 
87.5 
SCO 
173 
86.5 
200 
170 
86 
200 
165 
82.5 
200 
161 
83 
200 
162 
81 
200 
160 
eo 
200 
158 
;9 
200 
155 
77.5 
200 
153 
76.5 
20O 
153 
76.5 
200 
150 
75 
200 
144 
72 
20O 
132 
66 
210 
94 
47 
180 
130 
73.2 
140 
83 
59.2 
100 
63 
62 
80 
60 
75 
80 
68 
7i.5 
80 
54 
67.5 
80 
4H 
60 
60 
46 
75 
GO 
33 
55 
63 
30 
50 
60 
19 
31.6 
40 
28 
70 
40 
27 
67.5 
40 
£6 
65 
40 
S3 
57.6 
40 
21 
58.5 
20 
19 
95 
20 
13 
65 
33 
6 
30 
30 30 23 20 30 19 17 19 27 25 Average entry, 23 
Third Day, July 22. 
It was easier shooting on this day, judging from the high averages 
made. Five men made better than 90 per cent , and a whole raft of 
straights— fifteen of them— were chalked up on the blackboard. 
Powers was high with 15 lost targets out of 200 shot at -an average of 
93.5. His position as first on the list was not due to any large number of 
straight scores, torheonlv made one, and that wasin No. 3 event; but 
he shot a very strong gait all through, making three 19s and six 18s. 
Two of his 19s were good ones, made just at the right time, for they 
netted him second money alone in Nos. 2 and 4. Heikes was sec- 
ond with one break less than Powers, while Parmelee and Gilbert 
came along neck and neck for third and fourth places, only one 
break separating them fiom Heikes. Gilbert's scores are interesting- 
He started off with a loss of 10 targets out of Ms first 40 shot at; then 
he bracrd up with a 19, following it with three consecutive 20s, then 
■ two 19s, and lastly, two 18s; out of his last 160 targets he broke just 
1.53 -an average of 95.6. Gottlieb was fiftb with l8l breaks: he made 
a straight in Nos. 1, 3 and 4, falling down to 15 out of 30 in No. 2- he 
also had another 15 out of 20 marked up against him in No. 7. 
The 15 straigMs were divided up as follows: Gilbert and Gottlieb 3 
each; Heikes, Parmelee and Marshall 2 each; Powers, Budd and 
Henshaw 1 each. With so many straight scores, nineteen won first 
money in only two events on this day--No3 7 and 8. In Nos. 6 and 
10, Gilbert and Parmelee, respectively, took first money alone on 20 
straight. 
Events: 
13346678 9 10 Shot at. Broke. Av. 
C M Powers 18 19 
R O Heikes 18 20 
F S Parmelee 19 20 
F Gilbert 15 35 
C GottUeb 20 15 
T A Marshall 19 30 
C W Budd.......... 19 17 
CM Grimm 16 17 
GW Loomis 19 16 
Kibby 17 16 
Eddie Bingham 14 18 
Watson 15 11 
Henshaw 20 16 
Lineberger 16 15 
Linderman 16 17 
E A Leach.. 15 14 
Corey 12 16 
3?lummer,,, 14 .. 
Sanford. ........... 17 14 
Brucker....,,,.,,,.. 15 15 
Valentine 17 14 
Hejrman ., 
Abbott .. 
Mprtenson , , 17 . . 
Petit 16 .. 
Glasier IS 
Lewis 
Colby 
Gilson , , 
Day..... 5 .. 
Entries: 24 21 
20 19 18 
18 17 20 
17 18 19 
19 20 20 
SO 20 18 
19 17 16 
17 17 18 
18 15 15 
18 16 19 
14 14 16 
16 16 18 
13 11 14 
18 14 19 
18-., 17 
17 17 13 
.. 18 .. 
17 18 13 
12 13 
16 .. 
18 18 18 19 18 
18 19 19 17 18 
19 17 17 18 SO 
20 19 19 18 18 
17 15 18 19 19 
15 18 17 20 17 
18 18 15 .20 18 
16 18 16 19 19 
15 16 15 16 17 
17 17 16 18 18 
19 18 16 10 15 
12 14 16 14 10 
14 .... 14 17 
. . .. 17 17 19 
16 16 
16 18 13 . . . . 
14 
17 15 13 16 13 
17 14 
14 
17 
12 12 
16 10 
17 .. 
13 .. .. 
.. 11 .. 
.. .. 11 
200 
185 
92.5 
200 
184 
92 
200 
183 
91.5 
20O 
183 
91.5 
300 
181 
90.5 
200 
178 
89 
200 
177 
88.5 
800 
169 
81.5 
200 
167 
83.5 
300 
163 
81.5 
200 
160 
80 
*(J0 
129 
64.5 
160 
13J 
83.5 
140 
119 
85 
140 
112 
80 
ISO 
94 
78.3 
120 
90 
75 
130 
80 
66.6 
80 
62 
77.3 
80 
(A 
67.5 
60 
47 
78.3 
60 
41 
£8.3 
60 
40 
66.6 
40 
34 
85 
20 
16 
80 
20 
13 
.60 
20 
13 
60 
20 
11 
55 
20 
11 
55 
20 
5 
25 
19 17 16 18 15 16 20 19 Average entry, 18.5 
Fourth Day, July 23. 
This was live-bird day, and the scene was changed from Grand 
View to the camp grounds near the Oaks Hotel. The event of the 
day, of course, was the 25-bird race, S25 entrance, birds included, 
$50 added, four moneys, with a cut glass lemonade set donated by E. 
S. Rice, of Chicago, agent for Du Pont and Hazard powders. 
It was Heap Talk's lemonade set and first money, for he went out 
with 24 out of 25, losing his 16th bird. This 16bh round was fatal also 
to Charlie Budd's straight score; both he and Gilbert were straight 
up; to that round, but Charlie's bird managed to get away, and as he 
lost his 3l8t and 24th, 83 out of 25 was the best the Dago Chief could 
boast of. Chan Powers, Frank Parmelee and E. A. Leach divided 
second money on 23 each; George Loomis, Tom Marshall and Budd 
dividing third money on 23. Grimm had the good fortune to be alone 
in the 31 hole, taking 10 per cent, of the purse. 
The birds must have been a good lot, as the average for the 365 
shot at in this event was only just a fraction over 80 per cent., 294 
kills out of 365 shot at beine a larger proportion of ciphers than one 
generally sees on summer birds. Below are the scores in detail: 
Fred Gilbert , 2122112312222120113221222—24 
E A Leach 22222022121 1 ^03^2^2322222 -23 
0 M Powers , 3111131223110121032211222—23 
F S Parmelee „., 2301222231222232101222232 -23 
6 W Loomis 1123010121122310212223131—82 
T A MarshaU 2032223233202220i!23 231 223—22 
O W Budd . .,22122122213223302-,^31 02101—28 
C M Grimm 22203.i2220?33222222023012— 31 
Hughes 00031123121222201201131 —17 
Herman 
Watson 
Brucker, 
Heikes 
Kibby.,.. 
Plummer, 
Barringer 
Gottlieb 
■ «■■■«■• • • VI 
■ • * • • 
• ■ I • ftTI 
0312ii2J03312220202220 
301221210112003211120 
10121101120201311310 
03^220e0223023033S2 
0020310312122310 
220013I010>!120 
2310i0012ol0 
1200320100 
Bingham 003332000 
—16 
—16 
—15 
—14 
-11 
— 9 
— 7 
— 5 
— 4 
Fulford and Philanthropy. 
New Yoek, July Bl.— Editor Forest and Stream: As a trap-shooter 
I was much Interested in Mr. Fulford's criticism of the sayings of 
Messrs. Willard and McMurchy, published in your issue of to-day's 
date. He says: "Now I contend that professionalism has not hurt 
trap-shooting at all; it has helped it in the way of introducing better 
guns, loads and methods in shooting. * * * That professional 
shooters are not responsible is proven by the fact that strictly 
amateur shoots are not as well patronized as open s^hoots." 
That there was a benefit conferred by the professiooal shooter at a 
certain period of transition from the muzzleloader to the breech- 
loader, when the trap-shooters at large knew but little about the 
more improved arm, does not admit of argument. There were many 
kinds and qualities of the breechloader, some cheap and worthless 
others high-priced but faulty in mechanism, etc., so that the profes- 
sional—salaried or otherwise— really did a material service to the 
public in educating it on guns. Later there was a similar service 
rendered in the experimental stages of nitro powders and the 
gradual disuse of black powder at the traps and the use of nitro 
powder instead. There was then something to learn and something 
to teach. But the number of teachers multiplied out of all ratio to 
the number of pupils. There may be too many wolves infestuig a 
country for the number of sheep. The sheep might stand a reason- 
able amount of killing and still mcrease in numbers, but if the wolves 
killed faster than the sheep could produce, their numbers must 
naturally decrease. Some wolves thus may do little harm, but there 
mustn't be too many. 
That trap-shooting has fiourlshed Is not due to the professional 
He was but a coincident feature of it- hot a cause. Had the old sys- 
tem—wherein the professional and all others met on a dead level- 
been still in use, there would have been little trap shooting to-day 
That the ultra professionals are feared and looked upon as detri- 
mental to the sport, is shown by the multiplicity of systems which 
have been devised and tried for the purpose of handicapping them or 
to improve the chances of the non-professional. The new systems 
Inspired new hopes and further trials on the part of the aimateurs 
If they couldn't shake off the professional, they at least wished to' 
minimize nis wolfish appetite. But to-day the professional has no 
new principle to teach ; no great and new features to demonstrate- 
nothing but the trade rivalry of manufacturers whose goods are well- 
known, and have been well-known for years. The teaching and 
the philanthropy are fictions of the trap world. In the old days 
there were some wolves. But is to-day not better than '"the good old 
times" just because there are more wolves now than then? 
Let us concede that professionalism has done some good— yes a 
great deal of good. Has it not also done some harm? The unho'lv 
alliances made to scoop all the money at a tournament, the lowering 
of the diversion by malting it a wolfish industry instead of a whole- 
some sport, etc , have done much to harm it. 
The reason that the amateur tournaments are not the perfect suc- 
cesses that the open shoots are, is that they rarely have large 
purses; they do not encourage the real amateur, that is, the expert 
or good shots who are not professionals. There is a common belief 
that the term '-amateur" is synonymous with unskfilf ulness, and that 
in an amateur shoot the unskillful shot Is preferred. If tournament 
committees would endeavor to be accurate in their expression of 
tournament conditions, and say that professionals are barred, instead 
of saying a shoot for amateurs, then the shooting world would know 
precisely what they meant. When they say a tournament is for 
amateurs only, the shooters at large do not know precisely who are 
amateurs and who are not, and there are so many in ibe '-are or are 
not" class that, rather than meet a possible rejection, they stav awav 
sntirely. •> j 
However good and useful the professional shooter may have been 
n promoting trap-shooting In the past, it is not a logical consequence 
that he wUl always be so. Ha is not the same that he was in the past 
for he has increased in skill and numbers and business knowledge' 
He is not only individually skillful; he is an organizer. As a wolf he' 
is a big wolf, but when it is to the interests of his brother wolves' he 
knows how to train with the pack. ' 
The pretense of teaching is a sham at this late day. The special 
knowledge of the professionals of a decade or two ago is the common 
knowledge lo-day of the trap world. Indeed, a shooter can go Into 
any hardware or sporting goods store and get any advice, or load 
ready made for targets, pigeons, game birds or wildfowl. Everv 
locality has its trap-snooting club whose members have all the knowl- 
edge itf gtms, loads, etc , that is necessary. 
This plea of philanthropy is touching. Mr Fulford is a profes- 
sional, and as such he would argumentatively present only what was 
to his own advantage. He does not admit any harm at all from nro- 
fessionalism. Who would expect that he woula? But what does he 
leach? He works for a salary and snoots for money. Very well lie 
has a right to do so, but he has no right to say that he is doing it to 
benefit the public He is benefiting himself. 
There never was but one system derified which checked the rapac- 
ity of the wolves for the lambs, and that wa? the Rose system. They 
could not combine to scoop all the min3y. They c jald not drop for 
place, for the moment a m»n dropped into a vacant place the system 
adjusted his share with mathematical accuracy on a fixed ratio, anS 
he had only his part as fixed by that ratio. It gave all a fair chance 
for sport, who 'kicked?" It was the professional. He forgot about 
his devotion as a teacher, and howled a hoarse wolf ho^vl for the 
money. The "good old times" may have been what they were, but 
all time when it is the present time stands on its own merits. Be- 
cause there were some wolves ih ' the good old times," it does not fol- 
low as a sequence that the wolves made the good times then or tha% 
more wolves would make times better now. And it does not follow 
as a sequence that a wolf, being accused of wolflshness, is the best 
judge of his o wn case. When the wolf says to the lamb, "Comei to 
me, pretty latnb, I love you," it is time for the pretty lamb to do some 
thinking. Ai LambT 
Western Traps^ 
KUBEKA VS. GAEFIELD. 
July The ten-men team race between the Eureka Gun Club and 
the Garfield Gun Club was held to-day on the grounds of the Eureka 
Club. The contest was a close one, the home team winning by a mar- 
gin of 7 targets only. The scores were good. On the side of the 
Eurekas there were five 233 and three 23s; for the Garfields there was 
one 34 (Kuss, who missed his last target), three 33s and five 30s. 
Taking the teams as they shot, and dividing them off into squads of 
six. three from each team, the first squad was Dr. Hiller, Goodrich 
and Cunningham for the Eurekas; Fehrman, Fish and Edgar for the 
Garfields. In this squad the Eurekas gained a lead of 4 targets with 
64 to 60. The second squad was Lampbere, Antoine and Wright for 
the Eurekas; Bowers, Von Lengerke and Patterson for the Garfields 
In this squad the Eurekas added 8 more targets to their lead, scoring 
68 to 60. The next squad was Lord, Stannard and Glover for the Eu- 
rekas; Neal, Kuss and Conley for the Gerflelds. In this squad the 
ljurekas gained another target, making their total lead 8 targets. The 
Eureka trio scored 68 to 67 by their opponents, the whole squad only 
losing 15 targets out of the 150 shot at, an average of 90 per cent. The 
anchor men were Steck for the Eurekas and Dr. Shaw for the Gar- 
field? ; the Doctor scored 23 against Stacks 22, reducing the Eurekas' 
winning lead to 7, as stated above. Scores were as below; 
Eureka Gun Club. 
Dr Miller 1111110111111111111111110-33 
^ntoine llllOllllllllllllinniio-23 
Wright ; 0110111111111111111111111-23 
Lord... 1111111111011011111111111-33 
Glover 1111101111111011111111111-23 
Goodrich 1111011111111111100111111—22 
Stannard .....,««.. .-. . , . . llUllllllOlOlll 111011111—23 
Steck ., V...v...s.......^ 1111100111111111110111111—23 ■ 
Cunningham ........ i. i .......... . 1110011010101111110111111—19 
Lamphere 1001111111000110101101111—17—817 
Garfield Gun Club. 
guss limillllllllllllllilliO-24 
Patterson 1111111111111111011111101—83 
Neal 1111111111111111111101110-23 
Shaw 0111111111111011111111111-33 
Fehrman....,.,.,,... 1111911111010110011111111—20 
Fish OlllllUOllOllllllOOlllll-SO 
Edgar ,.>... 1111111111111101101100011-20 
Bowen 0111111011111111111100110—20 
Comley lOllllOlllOllUlOlllllOU— 20 
Von Lengerke 1110001110011101111100111—17—210 
Sweepstake events were shot as follows: 
Events: 
Targets: 
18346678 9101113 
16 S5 tS IS IB IS JO 15 10 16 iS 86 
9 13 
15 .. 
• • ■ » 
.13 .. 
• • • • 
14 84 
14 
19 
13 
; 13 1 
13 J 
" I 
a 4 
6 
8 
11 
14 
13 
Glover 15 .... 12 .. 13 
Lord 14 6 .. 
Stannard 13 .... 18 6 15 8 .. 
Lamphere.....;.,....,.,,.,..,... 13 22 13 9 .. 
L Willard .'ii,.. .14 15 13 .. 9 13 7 .. 
Lewis ,...•,,.»•■,**.,«••••....... 11 .. .. a, 9 .. .. 
Edgar....... 10 .. .. .. 4 
Kuss 13 . . .. 18 9 15 10 .. 
Goodrich..,.,,,,,. 15 9 
Bowers 11 .. 13 .... 12 7 
Spreyne. ........ 12 ,. .. 9 ,. U 9 
Fehrman 18 17.... 9 11 8.. 
Antoine..,....;....,.. .....15 .. 21 ,. ,, 12 .. .. 
Rehm , 12 .. 13 
Duncan.., 7 13 ,. 8 .... . 
Steck 14 14 16 '8 
Wrigbt 14 .. 16 11 ,. 15 5 .. 
Stanley r^^.;i..ii.»....;4. .. 10 11 8 8 
Porter....... ■■■■ .-.-..v. ....... .. 8 11 6 ., ,. .- 5 
CE Willard 15 21 ., .. 11 13 .. . 
West 14 
Cornell 15 12 6 
Jones............ 18 16 .. 11 la .. 9 
Stone 16 19 .. .. 10 7 
X)6 ^^olf. t 1 4 • • • 1^ 13 
Shaw .. 14 ., 
R B Carson..,.'. 16 12 
Patterson ' .. .. 15 
Rochliau ,, .. 11 
Bisbee , ,. .. 4 
Cunningham,.,,,.., .. .. 13 
Priokett 14 
Embrie .C... 13 
H F Carson...... .. .. 12 ,. .. .. 
Luther , , .... 2 , '3 
Miller ; 16 11 .. 13 7 
Von Lengerke.... 7 .. 10 9 
Comley ,. 12 11 13 8 
Neal ...... 13 13 10 
Ruble. , 14 14 10 
Pish l.iy. ....... ., 13 9 
Hollister. .,„,,,,.....,, ; 13 " " " 
Turner....... , , , ]\ 's ',', '." 
OAHJMET HEIGHTS GUN CLDB. 
July iS.— Nine members of the Calumet Heights Gun Club took 
part to-day in the event at 35 targets, known traps, unknown angles 
The winner in Class A was Paterson with 25 straight; Norcomwith 
18 was winner in Class B, Schmidt winning easily in Class C with 23 
breaks. Scores: 
Paterson (A) 1111111111111111111111111—86 
Young (A)...,.,.. 1101110111011111111101011-20 
Booth (A) ,- 00111111Hllliliiiiiiiin_'j3 
Turtle (A) 1011100010001101100100011—12 
Norcom (B) 1111010011110011011111101—18 
Greely (B). IIIIIIIIOOIOIOIUOOOOIIOI— lb 
Morgan (C) 0010010010000010010010110— 8 
Chamberlam CC) llHlllllOillOOlllOOOlOOO-16 
Schmidt (C) .1111111111111011101111111-28 
Sweepstake events were shot as below, Nos. 1 and 4 being at known 
traps, unknown angles; No. 2 at reversed order; No. 3, snipe shoot- 
ing, and No. 5 at 5 pairs: - 
10 
7 
13 
16 
11 20 
14 84 
14 
Events: 1 3 3 4 5 
Targets: 15 10 10 30 10 
Paterson , . . , 11 10 8 80 
Young 13 
Booth 14 
Morgan 4 
Events: 3 3 4 5 
Targets: 15 10 10 20 10 
Schmidt , 7 5 37. 
S 7 19 6 Norcom 9 6 5 4 
9 9 16 5 Chamberlain 9., ,. 
. 4 .. .. Patti 
GARDEN CITY GUN CLDB. 
July St.— The regular weekly shoot of the Garden City Gun Club 
was poorly attended, several members being absent on account of 
gomg to see the Eureka-Garfield team race. Scores made to-day 
were: 
Donnelly Prize. 
Hutchinson 1111111011111111111011111—23 
Helliman 1101110111001111111011111—30 
Goldsmith HlOlOlllllUlOOlllllllOl-SO 
Smeads OlOlllOUOOllllliioilllll- 19 
Parker .„.«.. OOlllOlOOOlllOllllliiH 10-17 
Einstead. ...... i r. . . . 01 lOOlOlOlOlOllOllOlllOlO -14 
Levi 1110100101100101111011100-14 
Sweeps were shot as below: 
Events: 1 3 3 4 5 
Targets; 30 20 16 25 10 
Hutchinson . , 18 17 9 20 8 
Finstead ,,,,, 9 9 7 .. .. 
Smeads 13 ., 15 13 5 
HeUiman 13 .. 11 .. 4 
Levi 13 .. 7 11 4 
Events: 1 3 3 4 5 
Targets: 20 20 15 85 10 
Ludlow 17 XI 
Goldsmith i§ a 'g 
JParfeer 16 9 17 8 
Clark .. 8 8 .. 
No. 3 was shot with gun below elbow until the target was in the air* 
No. 4 was reversed order, and No. 3 at pairs, f sko. ' 
