362 
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY 
[Vol. 8, 
Table C. 
Correlation between numbers of bundles in hypocotyl and epicotyl of trimerous 
plants of line 75 
Epicotyl 
12 
13 
14 
IS 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
Totals 
8 
I 
I 
I 
3 
5 
36 
292 
40 
29 
5 
I 
4 
9 
I 
5 
12 
120 
13 
10 
2 
I 
II 
I 
2 
6 
48 
5 
I 
12 
62 
10 
7 
3 
21 
7 
8 
I 
2 
19 
4 
2 
12 
15 
3 
I 
2 
13 - • 
14 
I 
I 
15 
16 
I 
I 
17 
I 
I 
I 
Totals 
3 
16 
63 
164 
93 
41 
27 
4 
4 
I 
416 
Table D. Correlation between numbers of bundles in hypocotyl and epicotyl of dimerous 
plants of line 75 
JHypocotyl 
Epicotyl 
Totals 
ID 
II 
1 2 
13 
14 
IS 
16 
8 
116 
78 
74 
29 
22 
6 
8 
17 
13 
10 
4 
I 
I 
6 
5 
4 
2 
I 
2 
I 
143 
103 
86 
38 
26 
7 
9 
9 
I 
2 
2 
I 
" 
I 
I 
2 
I 
13 
I 
14 


17 
2 
I 
I 
3 
I 

Totals 
I 
4 
336 
46 
16 
10 
3 
416 
Table E. Correlation between numbers of bundles in hypocotyl and epicotyl of trimerous 
plants of line gj 
. Hypocotyl 
Epicotyl 
Totals 
12 
13 
14 
IS 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
3 
14 
170 
30 
17 
2 
I 
7 
92 
15 
9 
5 
I 
4 
38 
6 
2 
2 
I 
3 
3 
26 
16 
3 
8 
32 
382 ■ 
82 
38 
12 
I 
3 
33 
5 
5 
I 
I 
5 
3 
I 
12 
3 
I 
I 
14 
4 
I 
I 
13 
I 
14 
2 
15 
I 
I 
I 
I 
5 
18 
47 
236 
129 
56 
51 
10 
4 
I 
557 
