W. R. Macdonell 95 
TABLE III. 
Give u inferences. Mea n s. 
Character 
Male 
Female 
Moorfields 
Whitecliapel 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
S 
Q 
527-1 
378-5 
305-4 
524-2 
377-1 
307-9 
512-7 
365-6 
293-1 
503-8 
362-8 
294-0 
The male skulls are strikingly alike, while in the female skulls the larger U 
was to be expected in the Moorfields group, owing to their greater length and 
breadth. 
We next come to characters of which the frequencies in the Moorfields series 
are very few, and the comparison is thus less satisfactory. 
TABLE IV. 
Face Measurements. Means. 
Male 
Female 
Character 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
G'H 
68-1 
70-2 
64-1 
65-9 
GB 
93-9 
90-9 
86-9 
84-9 
J 
129-0 
130-0 
122-0 
120-3 
NH 
50-4 
51-2 
48-0 
48-7 
NB 
24-0 
24-3 
23-4 
23-2 
41-8 
43-1 
40-9 
41-2 
OyR 
42-3 
43-0 
40-9 
40-9 
O.2L 
32-8 
33-5 
32-8 
33-6 
0,R 
32-8 
33-4 
32-6 
33-7 
The only important differences are in G'H and GH (upper face height and face 
breadth) the former of which is shorter, the latter broader in the Moorfields skulls, 
both male and female. 
As regards the palate, the two series agree in length, but differ considerably in 
breadth, in males and females, but breadth of palate I have again found a some- 
what unsatisfactory character to measure*. 
Biomelrika, Vol. in. p. 202. 
