W. R Macdonell 
97 
TABLE VII. 
Givcumferences. Coefficients of Variation. 
Male 
Female 
Character 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
U 
2-74 
2-87 
3-32 
2-92 
S 
3-17 
3-63 
3-71 
3-90 
Q 
4-11 
3-70 
3-79 
3-97 
Here again the two series agree very well. 
The frequencies of the remaining characters are too few in the Moorfields group 
to enable us to make a satisfactory coniparison ; I give, however, in the following 
Table the figures for face measurements. 
TABLE VIIL 
Face Measurements. Coefficients of Variation. 
Male 
Female 
Character 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
Moorfields 
Whitechapel 
G'H 
5-99 
5-50 
5-71 
7-14 
GB 
4-74 
5-58 
5-75 
5-40 
J 
3-60 
4-28 
3-54 
4-13 
XH 
5-16 
5 -OB 
5-74 
5-55 
iVB 
7-91 
8-89 
8-21 
7-06 
OyL 
3-61 
4-20 
4-02 
3-53 
3-35 
4-69 
4-09 
4-00 
0.,L 
6-47 
5-61 
7-11 
4-31 
Oolt 
6-46 
6-65 
6-22 
4-47 
The most important difference is in (upper face height) and in the breadth 
of orbit, in females, but the smallness of the Moorfields frequencies has to be kept 
in mind. 
The coefficients of variation in palate measurements are markedly different in 
the two series in males, but in females they are about the same. 
The following Table gives the coefficients of variation of those indices, for which 
the frequencies are over 30 in the Moorfields series. 
Biometrika v 13 
