W. R. Macdonell 
235 
four races it is greater than that between cephalic and bizygomatic breadths. The 
low correlation between B and B', and B and Jin the two Egyptian series, especially 
in the Naqadas, is to be noted. 
In the English, the female is less highly correlated than the male. 
Correlations of Capacity. 
TABLE XIII. 
Capacity and Height, Breadth and Length. 
C and H 
C a 
Qd B 
C and L 
Eace 
? 
S 
? 
cT 
? 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
English 
Naqada 
German 
Aino 
Sioux 
7£ 
86 
100 
76 
57 
■501 + -059 
■642 + -043 
•243 + ^064 
•544+ ^054 
•440 ±^070 
78 
114 
99 
52 
■600+ ^049 
■519+ ^046 
■451 + ^054 
•521 ± -068 
72 
89 
100 
76 
57 
•631 + -048 
•434+ -058 
•672 + ■037 
•561 + ^053 
•67 ±^05 
80 
123 
99 
52 
•646+^044 
•532 + ^044 
■706 ± •034 
•502± ^070 
72 
89 
100 
76 
57 
■597+^051 
•501 + ^054 
■515 + ^050 
■893+^016 
■54 f06 
78 
123 
99 
52 
•691 + ^040 
•599 +^039 
•687 ± -037 
•663 ±^053 
Means 
•48 
•52 
•60 
■59 
■61 
•66 
There is no striking ilifference between the sexes in our series, such as exists 
between German ^ and % in the pair C and H, and Aino J' and $ in C and L, but 
here again the English female is more highly correlated than the male, in this 
respect again agreeing with the Germans throughout, and also with the Naqadas 
except in the pair C and H. In Ainos the position is reversed the male being 
the more highly correlated. 
We have only Naqadas and Theban mummies for comparison in the case of 
capacity and circumferences. 
TABLE XIV. 
Capacity and Circumferences. 
C ai 
id U 
C aud Q 
C and iS' 
Eace 
c? 
d 
? 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
No. 
English 
Naqada 
Theban ) 
MummiesJ 
202 
•820 + -026 
•681 ±-040 
•813f0l6 
80 
115 
96 
•848 + ^021 
■723 + -030 
•826 ± -022 
72 
84 
202 
•812 + -027 
•656 ± ^042 
■788 ±-018 
79 
118 
96 
■744 + -034 
■603 + -0.39 
■673 + ^038 
•714 ±^039 
■811 ±^026 
30— '2 
