W. R. Macdonell 
237 
females. The difference may be partly due to the different methods of measuring 
the English and Naqada orbit and palate, but in nasal and facial correlations also, 
where the methods adopted were the same, there is a marked contrast between 
the two races. 
Index Correlations. 
The following Table shows how the chief index characters are associated with 
each other in the two series, English and Naqada. 
TABLE XVI. 
Character 
English 
Naqadas 
S 
? 
S 
? 
Chamaecephaly 
Leptorrhiny 
L. Hypsiconchy 
R. Hypsiconchy 
Brachystapliyly 
Platyrrhiny 
Hypsiconchy* 
Chamaeconchy 
Brachystaphyly 
Platyrrhiny 
Chamaeconchy 
Chamaeconchy 
Leptostaphyly 
Platyrrhiny 
Hypsiconchy f 
Hypsiconchy t 
Brachystaphyly * 
Brachycephaly 
Platyrrhiny 
L. Chamaeconchy 
R. Chamaeconchy 
Leptostaphyly 
Leptorrhiny 
Hypsiconchy t 
Chamaeconchy t 
Brachystaphyly * 
Leptorrhiny 
Hypsiconchy 
Hypsiconchy 
Brachystaphyly 
Leptorrhiny* 
Chamaeconchy* 
Chamaeconchy * 
Brachystaphyly 
Platyrrhiny 
L. Chamaeconchy 
R. Chamaeconchy 
Brachystaphyly* 
Chamaeconchy 
Chamaeconchy 
Leptostaphyly t 
Chamaeconchy 
Chamaeconchy 
Leptostaphyly 
Chamaeconchy 
Chamaeconchy 
Brachystaphyly * 
Brachystaphyly 
L. Chamaeconchy 
R. Chamaeconchy 
Chamaeconchy* 
Chamaeconchy 
Hypsiconchy 
Hypsiconchy 
Hypsiconchy 
Hypsiconchy 
L and R denote left and right orbit. 
The comparatively high degree of association of platyrrhiny with chamaeconchy 
in both sexes is a marked feature in both races ; so also is the very low correlation 
between the orbital indices and chamaecephaly and brachycephaly in the female 
of both races |. 
Cephalic Indices and L, B and H. 
Table XVII below shows the correlation of the cephalic indices, and the 
correlation of these indices with length, breadth and height, in English, French 
* Correlation very small, or almost insensible, 
t Correlation Insensible. 
X In the above Table I have corrected one or two slips in C. D. Fawcett's memoir; e.g., p. -IGO, 
she states that in the male Naqada chamaecephaly is associated with hrachystapliijlhie characters 
and the little association in the female is with leptostuphyline characters. A glance at her Table on 
p. 455 shows that brachystaphyline and leptostaphyliue have here got interchanged, p. 462 [a), brachy- 
cephaly as the table shows is associated with chamaecranial and not Jnjp.ticranial characters as 
inadvertently mis-read. Finally in (6) on the same page platy cranial in line 2 of the paragraph must be 
interchanged with stenocranial in line 3. 
