222 Miscellanea 
TABLE IV. Kent. 
Fii'«t Flower. 
3 
4 
5 
6 
5 
Totals 
s 
3 
1-2 
44 
22 
78 
o 
4 
44 
474 
599 
12 
1129 
s 
22 
599 
4532 
30 
1 
5186 
6' 
12 
30 
6 
48 
o 
2 
2 
o 
o 
<S 
1 
1 
Totals 
- 78 
1129 
5186 
48 
2 
1 
6444 
TABLE V. Surreij. 
First Flower. 
3 
4 
G 
Totals 
4 
4 
8 
4 
94 
111 
6 
215 
4 
111 
514 
20 
649 
6 
G 
20 
8 
34 
Totals 
8 
215 
649 
34 
906 
TABLE VI. Essex. 
First Flower. 
3 
4 
5 
6 
Totals 
3 
2 
2 
2 
6 
i 
2 
92 
152 
1 
247 
2 
152 
1528 
2 
1684 
6 
1 
2 
3 
Totals 
6 
247 
1684 
3 
1940 
IV. On the Association of Drawing with other Capacities in 
School Children. 
By ETHEL M. ELDERTON, Galton Eugenics Laboratory. 
An interesting paper* has recently been published by E. IvanolF discussing the association of 
power of good drawing in boys and girls with other capacities. The relationships, however, are 
not expressed in terms of any modern statistical measure of correlation t, and it is accordingly 
not easy to determine whether drawing capacity is highly or slightly correlated with other 
* Eecherches experimentales sur le Dessin ties Ecoliers tie la Suisse Remande. Archives de Psycho- 
logie, in. viii. 1908. 
t From the standpoint of theory very grave objections indeed might be raised to M. Ivanoff's treat- 
ment of correlation, especially to his use of four correlations from a single table wh'ph are not 
independent. 
