W. H. GlLBY 
101 
necessarily owing to personal equation in the teacher, but is largely due to the 
fact that the experienced teacher in his estimate of intelligence gives us some- 
thing of more importance than examination value, and not wholly measurable 
by examination value. At any rate the results reached are sufficient to condemn 
all a 'priori sweeping judgments as to the futility of the teacher's estimate 
of " general intelligence." 
TABLE I. 
Age and Standard. 
Standard. 
o3 
be 
I 
II 
III 
IV 
V 
VI 
VII 
VIII 
Totals 
14 
2 
16 
8 
39 
10 
6 
55 
52 
38 
20 
1 
111 
9 
27 
70 
57 
1 
1 
156 
H 
19 
43 
82 
18 
3 
165 
10 
7 
20 
66 
36 
5 
134 
m 
4 
15 
43 
37 
22 
2 
123 
a 
1 
10 
37 
40 
33 
9 
1 
131 
3 
7 
23 
30 
55 
27 
4 
149 
12 
1 
3 
10 
25 
52 
35 
11 
137 
m 
6 
9 
23 
63 
22 
3 
126 
IS 
2 
1 
11 
26 
71 
23 
1 
135 
m 
1 
5 
18 
54 
48 
6 
132 
14 
8 
8 
39 
34 
15 
104 
U\ 
1 
3 
7 
13 
12 
36 
15 
1 
4 
4 
6 
15 
Totals 
167 
221 
352 
221 
250 
311 
160 
13-30 
43 
1725 
Means 
8-70 
9-42 
9-98 
11-11 
11-91 
12-85 
14-08 
11-14 
Found from vertical arrays r taken = rj = -853. 
TABLE II. 
Standard and Intelligence. 
Standard. 
I 
II 
III 
IV 
V 
VI 
VII 
VIII 
Totals 
B 
17 
23 
42 
16 
18 
10 
4 
130 
C 
27 
34 
42 
25 
38 
32 
19 
2 
219 
D 
45 
61 
69 
41 
66 
73 
39 
13 
407 
E 
50 
66 
117 
75 
77 
80 
52 
18 
535 
F 
27 
36 
72 
53 
45 
98 
35 
9 
375 
G 
1 
1 
10 
11 
6 
18 
11 
1 
59 
Totals 
167 
221 
352 
221 
250 
311 
160 
43 
1725 
c£ 2 = - 0556, corrected <£ 2 = -0353. Correlation +-185. 
