R Crewdson TCenington 
307 
Cephalic Indices. 
Male 
Female 
100B/L 
100 HjL 
100 BjL 
100 H\L 
Bavarians 
83-2 
74-2 ( + 9-0) 
83-1 
73-9 ( + 9-2) 
Wiirtemberger 
82 "5 
73 - 0 ( + 9"5) 
82 - 8 
73 "2 (+9*6) 
French 
79-8 
72-6( + 7-2) 
Congo ... 
78-0 
75-4 ( + 2-6) 
76-5 
74-6 (-T9) 
Copts ... ... ... 
77-3 
77-5 (-0-2) 
76-6 
76-1 ( + 0-5) 
Aino 
76-5 
75-6 (-0-1) 
77-6 
76-7 ( + 0-9) 
Gaboon, 1880 
75-9 
75-0 (+0-9) 
76-4 
76-8 (-0-4) 
Gaboon, 1864 
75-5 
75-5 ( 0-0) 
76-2 
75-7 ( + 0'5) 
English, Moorfields ... 
75-5 
68-4 ( + 7-1) 
75-1 
67-2 ( + 7-9) 
Theban Mummies ... 
75-1 
74-7 (+0-4) 
76-5 
74'7 ( + 1-8) 
English, Whitechapel 
74-3 
70-1 (+4-2) 
74-7 
69-1 ( + 5-6) 
Zulus ... 
74 3 
75-0 (-0-7) 
Angonis 
73 1 
74-3 (-1-2) 
Naqadas 
73-0 
73-3 (-0-3) 
74-2 
73-2 ( + F0) 
Northern Negroes 
72-9 
74-2 (-1-3) 
Kaffirs... 
72-0 
72-0 ( 0-0) 
racial relationship. But quite a different light is thrown on the whole matter, if 
we take as our character the index 100(5— H)/L, i.e. the difference of the two 
cephalic indices as shown by the numbers in brackets; we then have the following 
arrangement : 
Wiirtemberg Women 
+ 9-6 
Gaboon Men, 1880 ... 
... +0-9 
Wiirtemberg Men 
+ 9-5 
Coptic Women ... 
... +0-5 
Bavarian Women 
+ 9-2 
Gaboon Women, 1864 
... +0-5 
Bavarian Men ... 
+ 90 
Theban Egyptian Men 
... +0-4 
English (Moorfields) Women ... 
+ 7-9 
Gaboon Men, 1864 
... +0-0 
French Men 
+ 7-2 
Kaffir Men 
... +0-0 
English (Moorfields) Men 
+ 7-1 
Aino Men 
... -0-1 
English (Whitechapel) Women 
+ 5-(J 
Coptic Men 
... -0-2 
English (Whitechapel) Men ... 
+ 4-2 
Naqada Men 
... -0-3 
Congo Men 
+ 2-6 
Gaboon Women, 1880 
... -0-4 
Long Barrow Women... 
+ 2-3 
Zulu Men 
... -0-7 
Long Barrow Men 
4-2-2 
Angoni Men 
... -1-2 
Theban Egyptian Women 
+ 1-8 
Northern Negro Men 
... -1-3 
Naqada Women 
+ 1-0 
Congo Women 
... -1-9 
Aino Women ... 
+ 0-9 
It is at once seen that this 
list is far 
more significant than the 
previous one 
the modern European races stand at one end of the scale, the negroes at the 
other and the prehistoric and primitive races in the centre. The women as 
a rule stand above the men ; probably, not because the numerator B — H is for 
women relatively greater, but because L owing to the development of the super- 
ciliary ridges is relatively greater in man. On this account when this index has 
been calculated for a larger number of races, it may be desirable to keep the two 
39—2 
