Kathleen V. Ryley and Julia Bell 
425 
It will be of interest to investigate whether the correlations of c/> and qS are 
higher than those of the cuneal indices. The following table* (XXIII) gives the 
TABLE XXIII. Simotic Nasal Angle <f>'. 
6 
? 
(a on H as 
4o o 
(jOTlltCtS 
/IT 
English 
45-5° 
English 
43-0° 
Hindoos 
41 o 
1 J nuloos 
qq ■n° 
oo w 
Egyptians 
41-6° 
Egyptians 
36-5° 
Veddahs 
41-1° 
Veddahs 
36-4° 
Aiuos 
40-9° 
Nubians 
34-3° 
Borneo 
34°8° 
Javanese 
34-1° 
Javanese 
33-2° 
Malays 
34-0° 
Gaboon, 1864 
31 -7° 
Philippines 
30-1° 
Philippines 
31-3° 
Gaboon, 1H64 
29-0° 
Borneo 
31-1° 
Congo 
27-2° 
Celebes 
30-7° 
Sumatra 
30-3° 
Gaboon, 1880 
30-1° 
Nubians 
25-2° 
Moluccas 
28-0° 
Congo 
27-1° 
Gaboon, 1*80 
24-6° 
Chimpanzees 
23-2° 
Chimpanzees 
20-3° 
fSymp/ialangus 
11-5° 
f Symphalangia 
11-5° 
t Hylobates 
9-8° 
t Hylobates 
9-8° 
Mean 
32-3° 
Mean 
29-8° 
Tlte smaller <fi' the flatter the simotic portion of the nasal bridge, i.e. the greater the simosis. 
TABLE XXIV A. Maxillary Nasal Angle (f>. Mean and Variability. 
Male 
Female 
Mean 
Standard 
Deviation 
Coefficient of 
Variation 
Mean 
Standard 
Deviation 
Coefficient of 
Variation 
Egyptians 
\ Hylobates (J + $ ) 
English 
Javanese ... 
Gaboon, 1864 
Congo 
Gorillas ... 
Chimpanzees 
54-33 ± -57 
53-06±l-50 
50-63+ -55 
46-06+ -91 
45-94+ -53 
44-13+ 53 
36-12+ -96 
35-96 + 1-80 
5-97+ -40 
8-90+1-06 
5-74+ -39 
8- 43+ -64 
5-34+ -37 
5- 52+ -37 
6- 56+ -68 
9- 61+1-27 
10- 99+ -75 
16-78 + 2-06] 
11- 35+ -78 
18-31 + 1-44 
11- 63+ -82 
12- 50+ -86 
18-15 ±1-95 
26-74 + 3-78 
54-29± -53 
49-15+ -48 
49-19+ -64 
43-30+ -71 
39-92 + 1-10 
34-39 + 1-82 
5-56 ± -37 
5-00± -34 
5-62+ -45 
5-27+ -50 
7- 11 t -78 
8- 12 + 1-29 
10-24 ± -70 
10- 17 ± -69 
11- 43+ -93 
12- 16 + 1-18 
17 -82 ±2 -01 
23 -60 ±3 -96 
* These values of <p' are calculated from the mean racial simotic index. In Table XXIV b the 
mean value of 0' as obtained from averaging the simotic angles of the individual members of the race 
is given for a few races as well as the variabilities for these selected races. The agreement of the 
directly and indirectly calculated means is quite reasonable. 
t Both sexes together. 
