356 A Study of the Hand 
TABLE XVI. 
Bones of the Middle Finger. Right Hand. 
46 Cases 
J?s., 
Rm^ 
Rs^ 
Rds 
1 
•810 + -034 
•743 + -045 
•701±^051 
•810 + -034 
1 
•900 + ^019 
•693 + -052 
•743 + ^039 
•900 ±^01 9 
1 
•680+^054 
•701 + ^051 
•693 + ^052 
•680 + ^054 
1 
TABLE XVIL 
Bones of the Middle Finger. Left Hand. 
45 Cases 
Ls^ 
1 
•797 + -037 
•680+ -054 
•686 + •OSS 
•797 ± ^037 
1 
•836 + -034 
•571 + ^068 
•680 + ^054 
•836 + -034 
1 
•602+^064 
•686 + ^053 
•571 + -068 
•602+^064 
1 
Here there is in every case a right-hand preponderance. The correlations are 
also greater than for the thumb or index finger bones. Lastly, the rule as to 
neighbourhood is again significantly broken for both hands in the case of the 
distal phalanx which is in both cases most highly correlated with the corre- 
sponding metacarpal bone. 
TABLE XVIIL 
Boves of the Ring Finger. Right Hand. 
45 Cases 
Rm^ 
RPi 
RSi 
Rd^ 
R7)l^ 
Rs^ 
Rdi 
1 
•806 + ^035 
•799+^036 
•697 + -052 
•806 + ^035 
1 
•899 ±-019 
■626 +^061 
■799 + ^036 
•899+^019 
1 
•667 + ^056 
•697 ± -052 
•626 + ^061 
•667 ± ^056 
1 
TABLE XIX. 
Bones of the Ring Finger. Left Hand. 
45 Cases 
Ld^ 
1 
•792 + ^038 
•732 + ^047 
•583 + ^066 
■792 + ^038 
I 
■844 + ^029 
•625 + ^061 
•732 + -047 
•844 + -029 
1 
•596 + •oes 
•583+^066 
•625 + ^061 
•596 + ^065 
1 
