C. D. Fawcett 
439 
If we turn to the length, breadth, and height of the skull, our data for com- 
parison are still more sparse. We find : 
Eace. Length. Breadth. Auricular Height. 
6 
? 
6 
? 
6 
? 
Bavarian * 
3-37 
3-57 
3-89 
3-39 
4-47 
3-91 
English-|- 
3-44 
3-66 
3-55 
3-78 
Frenchl 
3-97 
3-65 
4-21 
3-67 
Naqada 
317 
314 
3-29 
3-45 
3-86 
3-54 
Aino* 
3-20 
308 
2-76 
2-68 
3-67 
3-18 
Again the Naqada lie between the ' primitive ' Aino and the high modern 
civilisations. 
Of circumferential measurements we can only compare : 
Eace. Horizontal Circumference. Vertical Circumference. 
6 
? 
6 
? 
Bavarian § 
2-86 
3-09 
Ancient Egyptian || 
2-74 
2-85 
2-67 
2-84 
Naqada 
2.54 
2-27 
3-32 
2-72 
Row Grave German S 
2-70 
2-40 
This table shows us much the same state of affairs, and we mark as usual the 
advance in variability with advancing civilisation. Only one other absolute 
dimensionll are we able to give a comparison with ; namely the length of the 
palate. We have: 
Eace. Length of Palate. 
c? ? 
Bavarian 6'42 6'85 
Naqada 6-49 7-41 
Thus Bavarian and Naqada data both agree in making the woman more 
variable in palate length than the man. All the above are comparisons of co- 
efficients of variation. 
For angular measurements we can only quote the variability in profile angle 
of the Bavarians : 
Eace. Standard Deviation. 
6 ? 
Bavarian 2°-79 3°-59 
Naqada 2°-87 3°-66 
* Dr Alice Lee : Phil. Trails. Vol. 1',I6, A, p. 230. 
+ Unpulilished data for the Whitechapel skulls deduced by Prof. Pearson. 
X Unpublished reductions of measurements in Broca's manuscripts by C. D. Fawcett. 
§ Pearson : The Chances of Death, Vol. i. pp. 356-7. 
II Deduced from Dr Alice Lee's data. Phil. Trans. Vol. 196, A, p. 262. 
Tl Eaw material enough is of course available, but the object of this present memoir is rather to 
show how craniological results are to be presented from the statistical side than to publish long 
reductions of other investigators' measurements. 
