G. D. Maynard 
307 
have not been used in this paper. No case of enteric having occurred among the 
inocuhited, the correhition would have appeared high; but the absence of a case 
amongst a small number of inoculated men has clearly no significance in view of 
the comparative rarity of the disease, and the small probability of a man, in- 
oculated or uninoculated, being attacked. Tables III and IV refer to local 
outbreaks in two regiments following their removal abroad. Tables VI and VIII 
contain statistics obtained from seven large Indian Stations, between January 1 
and June 30, 1907 ; these returns are stated by Major Buist to be the most 
complete, and are free from most of the errors that arc found in the other figures. 
TABLE I. 
Results of Antityplioicl Inoctilation. Stations Abroad. 
1/3/06 to 28/2/07. 
Iiiouulatioii 
Not attacked 
Attacked 
78fi 
5 
30757 
193 
31543 
198 
Totals 
791 
30950 
31741 
h= - 1-961324, ^• = 2-498566, 
•9243/-^ - •56067r^ + 2-48701r' - 2-45024/-- + /• + '00202 = 0, 
r = --0020 ±-01 14. 
TABLE II. 
Indian. Stations. 1/3/06 to 28/2/07. 
Inoculation 
+ 
Not attacked 
Attacked 
2122 
8 
37113 
770 
39235 
778 
Totals 
2130 
37883 
40013 
/*=- 1-142560, /• = 2-065319, 
- -18698r'''-|--21417rS-|--06927?-* + -87.398r3- r66701/--' + /-- -16165 = 0, 
?•= -2556 ±-0095. 
