2(M Peccavimusf 
Therefore, using (34) and (35), 
U{l(,— 1) flu- 
llL 
[ It 
+ 2^' AV'AV';,^ 
I'snt 
( /I- n- 
+ X 
4>' 
%1? 
2S I--'"' iXJ'+'Xt" - 2A\«+'A'(«+> + A,"Zt"+ 
ml 
Therefore, by (36), 
and using (26) of the original paper therefore 
Mean KN 
W {u— 1) 
2n- 
Adding these various terms to the mean value of M, as given by (39) of paper cited, 
we find for the corrected value : 
+ 3(t Wi (Ai«+2 - - i*-' (/^Vl/^s)] 
