Chap. XXII.] 
production figures. 
Table 33. 
439 
Detailed production of the Ndypur district in long tons. 
■ 
:900. 
1901. 
1902. 

1903. 
j 
1904. 
1905. 
1900. 
Total 
for each 
deposit. 
Total for 
each syn- 
dicate, 
etc. 
Central Provinces 
Prospecting Syn- 
ieate. ' 
— 

2. Gumglion . 
3,117 
1,731 
1,981 
220 
2,409 
3,222 
12,680 
3. Rimdongri 
1,355 
997 
3,031 
258 
5,641 
7. Kindri 
20,940 
26,913 
12,507 
19,546 
15,984 
12,897 
23,717 
1 32,504 
8. Mansar 
22,9i:i 
27,031 
15,924 
13,523 
13,293 
16,497 
18,731 
127,912 
1 4. S4tak 
•■ 
115 
3,581 
3,696 
15. Beldongri . 
3,114 
4,094 
5,347 
1,585 
1,344 
3,553 
19,037 
18. Lohdongri 
3,404 
15,395 
19,140 
7,207 
1,331 
20,922 
39,970 
107,369 
Vearlt totals 
47,257 
76,925 
53,396 
48,601 
32,413 
57,215 
93,032 
408,839 
408,839 
Central India Min- 
ing Co. 2- 
(50,437) 
9. Mansar Ex- 
tension. 
r 
1 
835 
637 
1,472 
10. Parsoda 
1 
160 
494 
654 
U. S^ttak 
1 
377 
1,248 
3,193 
4,818 
19. KScharwdhl 
20. Waregilon . 
!■•■ 
15,423 
1 
3,063 
2,973 
8,379 
5,340 
2,538 
16,782 
5,511 
■2-2. Mindri 
1 
11,745 
12,769 
4,471 
28,985 
22A. PanchSla, 
1 
1 
1,791 
1,791 
23. M&ncgion . 
5,576 
8,227 
15,525 
1 
29,328 
Yearly totals 
15,423 
35,014 
24,723 
31,754 
32,858 
139,778 
139,778 
Indian Manganeie 
Co.i 
1. Kodegdoa . 
11,4.30 
9,000 
11,094 
9,657 
41,187 
Yearly totals . 
11,436 
9,000 
11,094 
9,657 
41,187 
41,187 
' Supplied by Mr. A. D. .Sanders. The reason for the difference between these figures and those that 
have been incorporated in the Mineral Production is that tlie figures given here represent actual amounts 
raised, whilst those given in the Mineral I'roduction are at least partly figures of despatch and not of output 
(See page 432.) 
2 Supplied by Mr. H. D. Coggan. For the first two years the output figures of the various deposits 
were not kept separately. Of the 50,437 tons of manganese-ore quarried in these two years, 1902 and 1903, 
probably 2.'>,000 to 30,000 tons came from Waregftou. 
'Supplied by Mr. C". W. Walsh for 1905 and 1906. Figures for 1903 and 1904 are of doubtful ac- 
curacy. No exact figures seem to be available ; those given are oased on information from various sources. 
