at the Lincoln Meeting, 1854. 
373 
We awarded tlic prize to Messrs. Turner and Co., of Ipswich. All these 
machines did good work ; and we thought tliat of Mr. Stanley worthy of com- 
mendation. 
Crushers for every variety of Cake. 
Name. 
Quantity 
Crushed. 
Time. 
Power 
used. 
Price. 
Remarks. 
Garrett and Son 
Hornsby antl Sou . 
lbs. 
f 41 
\ 30 
( 41 
X 30 
7.5 
35 
1- 6 I 
•63 / 
2- 22 1 
82 ) 
£. s. d. 
110 0 
10 10 0 
C Slicep 
\ liuUocks 
I Slieep 
( Bullocks 
We awarded the prize to Messrs. Garrett and Son. With regard to the 
cake-crushers for hand-power, wc liiglily commended Mr. Nicholson's 
machines. 
TlTRXIP-CuTTERS. 
Name. 
Number 
of Revo- 
lutions. 
Quantity 
of Roots 
Cut. 
Compara- 
tive 
Power. 
Price. 
Remarks. 
llansome and Sims • . 
Samuelson , . . , 
{ i; 
17 
C 23 
( 44 
i l5 
2S 
28 
28 
28 
28 
2S 
28 
95 1 
158 J 
127 
115 > 
212 J 
68 \ 
96 S 
£. s. d. 
5 10 0 
4 10 0 
5 10 0 
5 10 0 
( Bullocks. 
) .Sheep, 
liiillocks and Sheep. 
( Siieep. 
) liullocks. 
( Bullocks. 
\ Siieep. 
The prize we awarded to Mr. Samuelson of Banbury. We also commended 
Carson's " Moody's Machine." A turnip-cutter of Mr. Pierce, attached to a 
wheelbarrow for the convenience of cutting in the field or for home-feeding 
purposes, we commended. 
IIa^-d PuLnxG Machixes. 
Name. 
Price. 
Remarks. 
Barnard and Bishop , . 
Simpson and Son .... 
£. S. fi, 
4 10 0 
5 10 0 
3 10 0 
11 11 U 
Sliced the roots. 
Sliced the roots finer tlian the above. 
Slired tlie roots. 
Roots well broken, but not a perfect pulp. 
We awarded Phillips's machine the prize, but consider there is still room ibr 
improvement. 
I'OXE ^ril.LS. 
Name. 
Time. 
Quantity 
power '.round 
required, j " 
Price. 
Remarks. 
Crosskill . . 
Comes", , 
3-40 
1 
lOi j 44 
.. 1 .. 
45 
Excellent work. 
Failed to w ork. 
We awarded the prize to jNIessrs. Crosskill's eccentric mill, which reduced 
unboiled bones nearly to powder. 
