at the Lincoln Meeting, 1854. 
PonTAiiLE Ekoines. 
375 
Name. 
No. of p . 
Horse- 
_ Horse-power, 
power. ^ 
Time of 
getting up 
Steam. 
Coal Con- 
sumed per 
Horse-power 
per Hour. 
Hornsb)' and Co. 
IJansome and Sims . 
Clayton and Shuttleworth 
Garrett and Son, 
Tuxford and Sons . 
Holmes and Sous 
Allchin 
Simpson 
Peneston 
Crosskill 
Hart and Son 
Sparke . . . 
Bnrgess and Key 
£. 
31 
32 
3G 13 
39 0 
47 10 
38 0 
3.5 10 
31 8 
2.=) 0 
36 13 
23 2 
d. 
6 
li 
4 
0 
0 
0 
8 
7 
0 
4 
Minutes. 
40 
51i 
39 
48 
33 
39 
4> 
47 
42 
38 
lbs. 
4- 55 
5- 1 
5-19 
5- 62 
6- 42 
8-46 
8-55 
12- 28 
13'28 
13- 5 
J ' f Trial failed in consequence of 
(imperfections in driving pulley. 
I i I [ Trial failed, owing to the 
1 6 ' 35 0 0 < breaking of the joint of slide 
I I (jacket in transit. 
( Trial not commenced, the regulations of the Society 
\not being complied with. 
Fixed Exgixes. 
Name. 
Eansome and Sims 
William Dray and C9. 
Clayton and Shuttleworth 
Tuxford and Sons . 
Turner and Co. . . 
Garrett and Son 
No. of 
Horse- 
power. 
Price per 
Florse-power. 
Coal Con- 
sumed per 
Hoi-se-power 
per Hour. 
£. a. d. 
lbs. 
8 
24 7 6 
6-15 
6 
27 10 0 
7-84 
6 
29 3 4 
8-94 
6 
29 3 4 
9-13 
4 
30 0 0 
10-25 
8 
26 5 0 
12-74 
Wm. Ovvkx. 
JouN V. GoocH. 
Drills. 
The drills exhibited at this Meeting were numerous, and though present- 
ing no striking novelty in constructiofi, several improvements had been made 
in small details by which their efficiency was increased without adding to their 
complexity, or increasing their cost. 
Prize 5. — For the best drill for general purposes there were five competitors ; 
the competition was mainly between Messrs. Hornsby and Son and Messrs. 
Garrett ; the peribrmance of both drills was so good in all respects that it was 
difficult to decide upon their comparative merits. The construction of Messrs. 
Hornsby 's drill was considered the most substantial, and to them the prize was 
awarded. 
