neiv species of North American Tortricidds, 517 
Tortr., 36 (1858); Fucelis, Wilk., Br. Tortr., 
199-200 (1859); Stn. Man., 11., 242 (1859). 
= Trycheris, Gn., Ind. Meth., 56 (1845). 
= ^GraphoUtha, Tr. {GraphoUta, Tr., 1829, emend. 
1830), Hein., Fern. 
This genus, created by Hiibner to include one species 
only, aurana, F., may fairly be taken to cover a much 
larger field. E. aurana is placed by recent authors in 
the genus Grapholitha, Tr., as restricted by Heinemann 
(Schm. Deutsch. Tortr., 177), but this very familiar name \.. \ (^uJjws 
was preoccupied by Hiibner [Verz. bek. Schm., 242-3 
(ante 1826), type rizolitha, Schiff., Hb., teste Stph.] (^^^^r^v^io- 
for a section of the Noctitidas, and requires a substitute. - 
Treitschke ignored, or possibly never saw Hiibner's 
work. The type of his genus GraphoUtha (Grapholita, 
Tr., 1829, emend. 1830), following Curtis' restriction of 
1831, became fixed as dorsana, F., by Lederer, in 1859, 
when he eliminated from Treitschke's section B the 
species included in the new genus Fhthorohlastisy Ld., and 
referred petiverella and its congeners to Dichrorampha. 
Duponchel [Hist. Nat. Lp. Fr., IX., 22, 263-5 (1834)] 
cited nisella, CI. (= fetrajiay Dp.) as the type of 
G^-apholitha, but this species was not originally included 
by Treitschke and could not therefore have been his 
type ; he overlooked also Curtis' restriction of the genus 
to Treitschke's section B, adopting the name for section 
A, in which he was followed by Stephens, Wilkinson, and 
Stainton. 
GraphoUtha has been used in Staudinger and Wocke's 
Catalogue in a still wider sense to include subgenera 
which possess the costal fold. In any case another name 
must be adopted for this genus on account of its pre- 
occupation, and also because all or nearly all the species 
included in it had previously received other generic names. 
Without attempting clearly to define the range of the 
genus GraphoUtha, Tr. (Hein.), which may yet be 
capable of subdivision under other of the older names, I 
have here substituted for it the Hiibnerian name EuceUs. 
The family name GraphoUthinas, Fern., must certainly 
share a similar fate, but taking arcuella, L., as perhaps 
more clearly typical of the majority of genera included 
in the Trichophoridse (as representing the group of 
Tortricidse which possesses hair on the upper edge of 
