A Problem 
For findwg the Tear of the Julian Period a mi» a/id very ea/re 
Method. 
T His occurs in the fourml ^es Scavanf n\ g6^ as it had been propof^i 
communicaced to the Learned fefuit BE B I L LT, viz. 
Multiply the SoUr Cycle by 4845. and the Lmar\ by 4200. and that of 
the Indiction, by 6916* Then divide the Sum of the Produds by 798o.which 
is the fHli4n Period : The Remainder of the Divifion, without having re- 
gard to the ^Quotient, (hall be the year required after, 
E. g# Let fhe Cycle of the S««be g of the J^oe»4 j andofthe /;f- 
ftcti^rj.S' Multiply 3. by 4845, and you have 14^35; and 4. by 4200, 
comes 16800; and 5, by 6916, comes :5458o. The Sum of the pro- 
dufts is 65915, which being divided by 7980. gives 8» for the ^^otient^ 
and the number 1 07 5 , which remains, is the Year of the fulian Period, 
Soi^e learned Mathematicians of Paris, to whom the faid P. de Billj, di4 
propdfe this Problem^ have found the Demonftration thereof • as the fame 
^o/s^rwf?/ intimates. - 
J?i Account of fome (Booh^s^ not long fince pullifhei. 
X TENTAMINA PH YSICO^T HE OLOG ICA 
DE UEO.siveTHEOLOGlk SGHOL ASTlCA^^rf 
Nor mam N0V£ Reformats Philofophide concinnata^C^ duohus li- ^ 
hris corner ehenja, ^^orum alter 0^ de Dei exijientia adverjuf Atheos 
Epicnreos ex ipjbrummet Prwdpih diJpHtatfir ^ alterOy de ejup- 
dem Ejjentta €^ Attrihutis\ primo 'fecundum Jheologiam Ethnic am^ 
iibi expUcatur^ ^antum ha&enus Alii in Gentilium fententifs^ 
de fummi Nnmi/iis Natura eruendis^ hallucinati fuerint 5 deinde 
fecundum iheologiam Chrijlianam : Et quid de Divina Ejjentia 
ac Attributis ftatuendum jit^ diceretur, ^ibm pojiremo accedit 
Jpecialis Dijfertaiio de Primo Numinis Attributo.MtEKNlTATE. 
Authore Samtde Parkerv^k. 
This Treatife , pubhdied the laft year, would fooner have been taken no- 
tice of in ihde Trarts, had it not efcaped the PsihlijheryMitw till of late, 
when he, upon ierious perufa'l, found it very worthy the recommending it to 
all forts of perfons; and particularly to thofe who either pleafe themfelves 
with that fond opm on, Thit Philofophj if the AppreHti^if cf Atheifme '^ 
or hearken to the afperfions, that are generally laid upon the Reformation of 
Philofofhj, 
This excellent piece removes both thefe - and being joyned and compared 
with the truly Noble Mr. Bor/A Confiderations in his Firjt part of the 
